The Assessment of Quality of Life in Transitional Neighborhoods

被引:0
作者
Mohammad Soleimani
Simin Tavallaei
Hossain Mansuorian
Zahra Barati
机构
[1] Kharazmi University,Department of Geography and Urban Planning
[2] Kharazmi University,Department of Geography and Urban Planning
[3] University of Tehran,Faculty of Geography
来源
Social Indicators Research | 2014年 / 119卷
关键词
Quality of life; Subjective indicators; Objective indicators; Urban transitional neighborhoods; Darvazeshemiran neighborhood;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Quality of life (QoL) is being considered as one of the fundamental concepts in contemporary era. It tries to assess the level of general welfare of the communities. Urban transitional neighborhoods possess specific situation and as a result present distinctive QoL. The major objective of this study is to identify and measure the QoL dimensions in urban transitional neighborhoods using both objective and subjective indices pertaining to Darvazeshemiran neighborhood of Tehran. In order to accomplish this and gather needed data, 244 questionnaires were distributed among Darvazeshemiran’s residents. This study suggests that there exists low level of QoL in the study area. That is 64.3 % of the residents were dissatisfied with the prevailing level of QoL. This in turn is associated with the transitional nature of this neighborhood. The residents were strongly dissatisfied with regard to the environmental qualification as opposed to accessibility status. Furthermore, this study identified five objective factors respectively regarding QoL. There exists low correlation between subjective and objective dimensions. That demands simultaneous consideration of both objective and subjective dimensions. It is argued that individual treatments of each could not accurately represent the QoL of residents.
引用
收藏
页码:1589 / 1602
页数:13
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Aliakbari E(2010)Quality of urban life in Iran Social Welfare 36 121-148
[2]  
Amini M(2008)Subjective quality of life in Zhuhai City, South China: A public survey using the international wellbeing index Social Indicator Research 91 243-258
[3]  
Chen Z(1996)The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos Social Indicators Research 38 303-332
[4]  
Davey G(1985)Assessments of neighborhood quality in metropolitan America Urban Affairs Quarterly 20 511-535
[5]  
Cummins RA(2008)Urban quality of life: A case study of Guwahati Social Indicators Research 88 297-310
[6]  
Dahmann DC(2008)A mixed method approach to quality of life research: A case study approach Social Indicator Research 85 145-158
[7]  
Das D(2010)Iran’s architecture and urban planning in transition periods Identity of a City 6 3-14
[8]  
Dunning H(2008)A method of assembling cross-sectional indicators into a community quality of life Social Indicators Research 88 281-296
[9]  
Williams A(2008)An assessment of the quality of life in the European Union based on the social indicators approach Social Indicator Research 87 1-25
[10]  
Abonyi S(1999)A multidisciplinary concept analysis of quality of life Western Journal of Nursing Research 21 728-742