The Influence of Different Representations on Solving Concentration Problems at Elementary School

被引:0
作者
Chia-Ju Liu
Ming-Hsun Shen
机构
[1] National Kaohsiung Normal University,Director of Neurocognition Lab
[2] National Kaohsiung Normal University,undefined
来源
Journal of Science Education and Technology | 2011年 / 20卷
关键词
Representations; Concentration concept; Science learning; Elementary school students;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study investigated the students’ learning process of the concept of concentration at the elementary school level in Taiwan. The influence of different representational types on the process of proportional reasoning was also explored. The participants included nineteen third-grade and eighteen fifth-grade students. Eye-tracking technology was used in conducting the experiment. The materials were adapted from Noelting’s (1980a) “orange juice test” experiment. All problems on concentration included three stages (the intuitive, the concrete operational, and the formal operational), and each problem was displayed in iconic and symbolic representations. The data were collected through eye-tracking technology and post-test interviews. The results showed that the representational types influenced students’ solving of concentration problems. Furthermore, the data on eye movement indicated that students used different strategies or rules to solve concentration problems at the different stages of the problems with different representational types. This study is intended to contribute to the understanding of elementary school students’ problem-solving strategies and the usability of eye-tracking technology in related studies.
引用
收藏
页码:621 / 629
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Ametller J(2002)Students’ reading of innovative images of energy at secondary school level Int J Sci Educ 24 285-312
[2]  
Pintó R(2004)Eye movements do not reflect retrieval processes: limits of the eye-mind hypothesis Psychol Sci 15 225-231
[3]  
Anderson JR(1985)The effect of experience on reading topographic relief information: analyses of performance and eye movements Cartogr J 22 88-94
[4]  
Bothell D(1999)Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs Int J Ind Ergon 24 631-645
[5]  
Douglass S(2003)The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding Learn Instr 13 205-226
[6]  
Chang KT(1997)Multimedia and understanding: expert and novice responses to different representation of chemical phenomena J Res Sci Teach 34 949-968
[7]  
Antes J(2003)Technology and science education: starting points, research programs, and trends Int J Sci Educ 25 727-758
[8]  
Lenzen T(1967)The gaze selects informative details with pictures Percept Psychophys 7 173-178
[9]  
Goldberg JH(1999)Visual-spatial thinking: an aspect of science overlooked by educators Sci Educ 83 33-54
[10]  
Kotval XP(1980)The development of proportion reasoning and the ratio concept: part i—differentiation of stages Educ Stud Math 11 217-253