Evaluation of different DNA extraction methods for the detection of adulteration in raw and processed meat through polymerase chain reaction—restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP)

被引:0
作者
M. Ali Muhammed
B. Sri Charan Bindu
R. Jini
K. V. Harish Prashanth
N. Bhaskar
机构
[1] CSIR - Central Food Technological Research Institute (CSIR-CFTRI),Department of Meat, Fish & Poultry Technology
来源
Journal of Food Science and Technology | 2015年 / 52卷
关键词
Meat species identification; DNA extraction; PCR-RFLP; Partial cytochrome ; genes;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Methods currently used for the identification of the species to confirm the origin of meat or white tissue samples have not been validated for identification of different classes of vertebrates used for meat production, such as fishes, mammals and birds. Here, we describe an improved method for extraction, detection and differentiation of meat species using a single set of primers—for mitochondrial cytochrome-b gene by a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) based procedure—to detect adulteration in meat. The work compared three different methods (viz., salt precipitation, silica column based extraction & chloroform-phenol extraction) for extracting total genomic DNA. Of the three methods, salt precipitation and silica column based extraction was found better in terms of extraction efficiency and ease of handling as compared to the standard method of chloroform-phenol extraction which is laborious. To confirm the effectiveness and specificity of the cytochrome-b gene fragment, we tested nine genomic DNA samples (extracted from different aquatic species as well as other meat samples) and obtained positive results. Using this method, adulteration of meat (aquatic or otherwise) up to 0.01 % in case of raw meat; and, minimum of 1 % adulteration in case of cooked and processed meat mixtures could be detected. In conclusion, specific PCR-RFLP method resulting in an amplicon of size 360 bp of a short segment of cytochrome-b gene seems to be a powerful technique for the identification of adulteration in raw, cooked and/or processed meat products because of its simplicity, specificity and sensitivity.
引用
收藏
页码:514 / 520
页数:6
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Al-Dughaym AM(2010)Safety and quality of some chicken meat products in Al-Ahsa markets-Saudi Arabia Saudi J Biol Sci 17 37-42
[2]  
Altabari GF(2003)Design of universal primers for the detection of animal tissues in feedstuff Vet Res Commun 27 667-669
[3]  
Bottero MT(2002)Beef and bovine-derived material identification in processed and unprocessed food and feed by PCR amplification J Agric Food Chem 50 5262-5264
[4]  
Civera T(2012)Phylogenetic relationships among several freshwater fishes (Family: Cyprinidae) in Malaysia inferred from partial sequencing of the cytochrome b mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) gene Pertanika J Trop Agric Sci 35 307-318
[5]  
Nucera D(2007)Using the PCR–RFLP method to identify the species of different processed products of billfish meats Food Control 18 369-374
[6]  
Turi RM(2007)Studies on processing and shelf life of pork nuggets with liquid whey as a replacer for added water Am J Food Technol 2 38-43
[7]  
Calvo JH(2008)A multiplex PCR assay for species identification of raw and cooked bonito Food Control 19 879-885
[8]  
Rodellar C(1988)A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells Nucleic Acids Res 16 1215-66
[9]  
Zaragoz P(2003)Nucleic acid purification using microfabricated silicon structures Biosens Bioelectron 19 59-10
[10]  
Osta R(1990)Electrophoretic techniques for species identification of fishery products Z Lebensm Unters Forsch 191 1-4693