Assessing Taiwan’s pay-for-performance program for diabetes care: a cost–benefit net value approach

被引:0
作者
Jui-fen Rachel Lu
Ying Isabel Chen
Karen Eggleston
Chih-Hung Chen
Brian Chen
机构
[1] Chang Gung University,Graduate Institute of Business and Management and Department of Health Care Management, College of Management
[2] Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Linkou,Department of Radiation Oncology
[3] National Taiwan University,Graduate Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health
[4] Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center,Division of Metabolism
[5] Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies,Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health
[6] Stanford University,undefined
[7] and NBER,undefined
[8] Chang Gung Memorial Hospital,undefined
[9] University of South Carolina,undefined
来源
The European Journal of Health Economics | 2023年 / 24卷
关键词
Pay-for-performance; National Health Insurance; Diabetes; Net value; Taiwan; I18;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Pay-for-Performance (P4P) to better manage chronic conditions has yielded mixed results. A better understanding of the cost and benefit of P4P is needed to improve program assessment. To this end, we assessed the effect of a P4P program using a quasi-experimental intervention and control design. Two different intervention groups were used, one consisting of newly enrolled P4P patients, and another using P4P patients who have been enrolled since the beginning of the study. Patient-level data on clinical indicators, utilization and expenditures, linked with national death registry, were collected for diabetic patients at a large regional hospital in Taiwan between 2007 and 2013. Net value, defined as the value of life years gained minus the cost of care, is calculated and compared for the intervention group of P4P patients with propensity score-matched non-P4P samples. We found that Taiwan’s implementation of the P4P program for diabetic care yielded positive net values, ranging from $40,084 USD to $348,717 USD, with higher net values in the continuous enrollment model. Our results suggest that the health benefits from P4P enrollment may require a sufficient time frame to manifest, so a net value approach incorporating future predicted mortality risks may be especially important for studying chronic disease management. Future research on the mechanisms by which the Taiwan P4P program helped improve outcomes could help translate our findings to other clinical contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 733
页数:16
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
James J(2012)Health policy brief: pay-for-performance Health Aff. 11 2043-2050
[2]  
Eijkenaar F(2013)Effects of pay for performance in health care: a systematic review of systematic reviews Health Policy 110 115-130
[3]  
Figueroa JF(2016)Association between the value-based purchasing pay for performance program and patient mortality in US hospitals: observational study BMJ 353 1387-1408
[4]  
Grabowski DC(2017)The Impact of nursing home pay-for-performance on quality and medicare spending: results from the nursing home value-based purchasing demonstration Health Serv Res 52 1125-1140
[5]  
Milstein R(2016)Pay for performance in the inpatient sector: a review of 34 P4P programs in 14 OECD countries Health Policy 120 64-91
[6]  
Schreyoegg J(2010)Can you get what you pay for? Pay-for-performance and the quality of healthcare providers Rand J Econ 41 268-274
[7]  
Mullen KJ(2016)Long-term evidence for the effect of pay-for-performance in primary care on mortality in the UK: a population study Lancet 388 247-272
[8]  
Frank RG(2010)Systematic review: effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care BMC Health Serv Res 10 265-353
[9]  
Rosenthal MB(2006)Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care? Ann Intern Med 145 341-2184
[10]  
Ryan AM(2017)The effects of pay-for-performance programs on health, health care use, and processes of care: a systematic review Ann Intern Med 166 2167-1793