The invisible basal cell carcinoma: how reflectance confocal microscopy improves the diagnostic accuracy of clinically unclear facial macules and papules

被引:0
作者
C. Ruini
D. Hartmann
S. Saral
S. Krammer
T. Ruzicka
T. von Braunmühl
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilian University,Department of Dermatology and Allergology
[2] Städtisches Klinikum München,Clinic for Dermatology and Allergology
[3] Ankara University,Department of Dermatology
来源
Lasers in Medical Science | 2016年 / 31卷
关键词
Basal cell carcinoma; Reflectance confocal microscopy; Dermoscopy; Facial papules; Pink lesions;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Difficult to diagnose and early non-melanoma skin cancer lesions are frequently seen in daily clinical practice. Besides precancerous lesions such as actinic keratosis, basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) score the highest frequency in skin tumors. While infiltrative and nodular BCCs require a surgical treatment with a significant impact on the patients’ quality of life, early and superficial BCCs might benefit from numerous conservative treatments, such as topical immune-modulators or photodynamic therapy. Dermoscopy has shown a high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of early BCCs, and non-invasive imaging techniques like reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) have proven to be helpful. The aim of our study was to investigate the importance of RCM in the diagnosis of BCCs with indistinct clinical and dermoscopic features. We retrospectively examined 27 histologically proven BCCs in which diagnosis was not possible based on naked eye examination; we separately reviewed clinical, dermoscopic, and confocal microscopy features and evaluated the lesions meeting the common diagnostic criteria for BCCs, and our diagnostic confidence. All lesions were clinically unclear, with no characteristic features suggestive for BCC; dermoscopy showed in most cases unspecific teleangiectasias (74 %) and micro-erosions (52 %). Confocal microscopy revealed in most of the cases the presence of specific criteria: peripheral palisading of the nuclei (89 %), clefting (70 %), stromal reaction (70 %), dark silhouettes (70 %), inflammatory particles (70 %), and tumor islands (67 %). In the absence of significant diagnostic clinical signs and with unclear dermoscopic features, specific confocal patterns were present in most of the lesions and enabled a correct diagnosis. In the absence of significant clinical features of BCC and in the case of uncertain dermoscopy, striking confocal features are detectable and easy to recognize in most cases. Confocal microscopy can therefore be instrumentful in the diagnosis of the so-called invisible BCCs.
引用
收藏
页码:1727 / 1732
页数:5
相关论文
共 140 条
  • [11] Nagore E(2012)Dermoscopic features of basal cell carcinomas: differences in appearance under non-polarized and polarized light Dermatol Surg 38 392-399
  • [12] Menzies SW(2002)Real-time, J Am Acad Dermatol 47 869-874
  • [13] Westerhoff K(2007) confocal reflectance microscopy of basal cell carcinoma Arch Dermatol 143 883-886
  • [14] Rabinovitz H(2009)Dendritic cells in pigmented basal cell carcinoma: a relevant finding by reflectance-mode confocal microscopy Arch Dermatol 145 106-107
  • [15] Pehamberger H(2015)skINsight lessons in reflectance confocal microscopy: rapid diagnosis of pigmented basal cell carcinoma J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 29 1164-1169
  • [16] Steiner A(2015)Accuracy of J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 29 1890-1897
  • [17] Wolff K(2013) confocal microscopy for diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma: a comparative study between handheld and wide-probe confocal imaging Dermatology 227 255-262
  • [18] Giacomel J(2014) confocal microscopy of basal cell carcinoma: a systematic review of diagnostic accuracy J Am Acad Dermatol 71 716-724
  • [19] Zalaudek I(2004) diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma subtype by reflectance confocal microscopy J Am Acad Dermatol 51 923-930
  • [20] Demirtasoglu M(2010)Classifying distinct basal cell carcinoma subtype by means of dermatoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy Arch Dermatol 146 353-354