Measuring Disease Progression in Osteoarthritis

被引:0
作者
Laura L. Laslett
Jean-Pierre Pelletier
Flavia M. Cicuttini
Graeme Jones
Johanne Martel-Pelletier
机构
[1] University of Tasmania,Menzies Institute for Medical Research
[2] University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre (CRCHUM),Osteoarthritis Research Unit
[3] Monash University,Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine
[4] Alfred Hospital,undefined
关键词
Osteoarthritis; Knee osteoarthritis; Hand osteoarthritis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Radiographs; Ultrasound;
D O I
10.1007/s40674-016-0041-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Radiographs are a commonly used tool to assess disease progression in osteoarthritis (OA). However, it is not the preferred method of defining and following OA progression. While it is moderately responsive to change in terms of standardised response means (SRM), it is insensitive to change in cartilage measures. MRI offers a much better assessment, and OA features are much better targeted for defining and following the disease progression. Using MRI, cartilage volume/thickness loss predicts knee replacement and has similar levels of sensitivity to discriminate treatments in clinical trials. Cartilage defect is another target which was found to also be an independent predictor of some OA outcomes. In addition to cartilage, another MRI target for diagnosis and assessment of OA progression is subchondral bone alterations, especially bone marrow lesions (BMLs). BMLs independently predict OA outcomes including knee replacement and are sensitive to progression. Targeting of BMLs by bone remodelling agents demonstrates that the natural history of the disease could be diminished. MRI-detected effusion and synovitis are also promising targets of OA progression. In addition, alterations in these tissues are promising outcome measures for clinical trials. Newer MRI methods of cartilage quality assessment, including signal intensity on T1 images and dGEMRIC, have been proposed for assessing early cartilage loss. However, the requirement for a contrast agent with dGEMRIC precludes its widespread use on safety grounds. Another promising imaging modality for OA is ultrasound. However, this approach warrants further exploration as, although it has demonstrated a wide set of advantages over other imaging modalities, there are still major limitations. Evidence for use of ultrasound indices for assessing disease progression is limited. At present, this imaging modality may be better suited as a diagnostic and an explanatory tool within clinical practice rather than large-scale studies or clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 110
页数:13
相关论文
共 282 条
[1]  
Lane NE(2011)OARSI-FDA initiative: defining the disease state of osteoarthritis Osteoarthritis Cartilage 19 478-82
[2]  
Brandt K(1997)Osteoarthritis Lancet 350 503-8
[3]  
Hawker G(2012)Osteoarthritis: a disease of the joint as an organ Arthritis Rheum 64 1697-707
[4]  
Creamer P(2011)Bisphosphonates for osteoarthritis Arthritis Res Ther 13 128-14
[5]  
Hochberg MC(2010)Is osteoarthritis a disease involving only cartilage or other articular tissues? Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi Joint Dis Relat Surg 21 2-9
[6]  
Loeser RF(2005)Cruciate ligament laxity and femoral intercondylar notch narrowing in early-stage knee osteoarthritis Arthritis Rheum 52 3100-7
[7]  
Goldring SR(1999)Collagen remodeling in the anterior cruciate ligament associated with developing spontaneous murine osteoarthritis Biochem Biophys Res Commun 258 763-26
[8]  
Scanzello CR(2011)Osteoarthritis: an update with relevance for clinical practice Lancet 377 2115-62
[9]  
Walsh DA(2002)Prognostic factors of progress of hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review Arthritis Rheum 47 556-37
[10]  
Chapman V(2012)Prevalence of magnetic resonance imaging-defined atrophic and hypertrophic phenotypes of knee osteoarthritis in a population-based cohort Arthritis Rheum 64 429-502