Automating Teacher Work? A History of the Politics of Automation and Artificial Intelligence in Education

被引:0
作者
Rensfeldt A.B. [1 ]
Rahm L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Applied IT, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg
[2] Division of History of Science, Technology and Environment, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
关键词
Automation; Critical AI studies; Digital labor; History of educational technology; Platform infrastructures; Policy assemblage; Teacher work;
D O I
10.1007/s42438-022-00344-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The debate on automation in education is also a debate on teachers’ work. Throughout history, promises of labor-saving and efficient automation technologies have been repeatedly promoted, while research at the same time has rather argued that automations will always depend on extensive human labor. In this study, we historicize how automation in education has been related to teachers’ work and with what implications. Based on Sweden’s long history of educational technology, we have drawn on digital and archival materials published from 1957 to the present. By contrasting the policy elements on automation and artificial intelligence (AI) across the past several decades, we show how debates and technologies are dynamically established and naturalized over time, which also risk silencing the critical debates on what the politics of automation and AI means for teachers’ work and for public education. We conclude not only that the automation debate aligns with familiar ‘techno-solutionist’ educational technology histories, including forms of resistance on the technological uptake in education and society, but also that the scale and impact of automation are shifting with the technologies for automation and global platform infrastructures integrated into education. Consequently, one of the main questions is how the critical debate on automating teacher work and education is made possible even under such circumstances. © 2022, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 43
页数:18
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Andrejevic M., Automated Media, (2020)
[2]  
Bareis J., Katzenbach C., Talking AI into Being: The Narratives and Imaginaries of National AI Strategies and Their Performative Politics, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 47, 5, pp. 855-881, (2021)
[3]  
Burgess M., These Parents Built a School App, Then the City Called the Cops, (2021)
[4]  
Carlsson J., Ehn P., Erlander B., Perby M.-L., Sandberg A., Planning and Control from the Perspective of Labour: A Short Presentation of the DEMOS Project, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 3, 3-4, pp. 249-260, (1978)
[5]  
Clarke A.C., Electronic Tutors, Omni Magazine, 2, 9, pp. 77-78, (1980)
[6]  
Bred datautbildning: Betänkande, (1985)
[7]  
Cowan R.S., More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technologies from the Open Heart to the Microwave, (1983)
[8]  
Crawford K., Atlas of AI: Power, Politics and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence, (2021)
[9]  
Tillsyn Enligt Eu:S dataskyddsförordning 2016/679: Ansiktsigenkänning för närvarokontroll Av Elever. [EU Supervision according to the General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679: Facial Recognition Or Attendance Control of Students, (2019)
[10]  
Deleuze G., Negotiations, 1972–1990, (1995)