Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for Liver Cirrhosis 2020

被引:0
作者
Hitoshi Yoshiji
Sumiko Nagoshi
Takemi Akahane
Yoshinari Asaoka
Yoshiyuki Ueno
Koji Ogawa
Takumi Kawaguchi
Masayuki Kurosaki
Isao Sakaida
Masahito Shimizu
Makiko Taniai
Shuji Terai
Hiroki Nishikawa
Yoichi Hiasa
Hisashi Hidaka
Hiroto Miwa
Kazuaki Chayama
Nobuyuki Enomoto
Tooru Shimosegawa
Tetsuo Takehara
Kazuhiko Koike
机构
[1] The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology / The Japan Society of Hepatology,Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the “Evidence
[2] The Japan Society of Hepatology,Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Liver Cirrhosis”
[3] Nara Medical University,Department of Gastroenterology
来源
Journal of Gastroenterology | 2021年 / 56卷
关键词
Liver cirrhosis; Guidelines; Diagnosis; Treatment; Complications;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The first edition of the clinical practice guidelines for liver cirrhosis was published in 2010, and the second edition was published in 2015 by the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE). The revised third edition was recently published in 2020. This version has become a joint guideline by the JSGE and the Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH). In addition to the clinical questions (CQs), background questions (BQs) are new items for basic clinical knowledge, and future research questions (FRQs) are newly added clinically important items. Concerning the clinical treatment of liver cirrhosis, new findings have been reported over the past 5 years since the second edition. In this revision, we decided to match the international standards as much as possible by referring to the latest international guidelines. Newly developed agents for various complications have also made great progress. In comparison with the latest global guidelines, such as the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), we are introducing data based on the evidence for clinical practice in Japan. The flowchart for nutrition therapy was reviewed to be useful for daily medical care by referring to overseas guidelines. We also explain several clinically important items that have recently received focus and were not mentioned in the last editions. This digest version describes the issues related to the management of liver cirrhosis and several complications in clinical practice. The content begins with a diagnostic algorithm, the revised flowchart for nutritional therapy, and refracted ascites, which are of great importance to patients with cirrhosis. In addition to the updated antiviral therapy for hepatitis B and C liver cirrhosis, the latest treatments for non-viral cirrhosis, such as alcoholic steatohepatitis/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (ASH/NASH) and autoimmune-related cirrhosis, are also described. It also covers the latest evidence regarding the diagnosis and treatment of liver cirrhosis complications, namely gastrointestinal bleeding, ascites, hepatorenal syndrome and acute kidney injury, hepatic encephalopathy, portal thrombus, sarcopenia, muscle cramp, thrombocytopenia, pruritus, hepatopulmonary syndrome, portopulmonary hypertension, and vitamin D deficiency, including BQ, CQ and FRQ. Finally, this guideline covers prognosis prediction and liver transplantation, especially focusing on several new findings since the last version. Since this revision is a joint guideline by both societies, the same content is published simultaneously in the official English journal of JSGE and JSH.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 619
页数:26
相关论文
共 608 条
  • [1] Fukui H(2016)Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for liver cirrhosis 2015 J Gastroenterol 51 629-650
  • [2] Saito H(2011)GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables J Clin Epidemiol. 64 383-394
  • [3] Ueno Y(2011)GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes J Clin Epidemiol. 64 395-400
  • [4] Guyatt G(2011)GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence–imprecision J Clin Epidemiol. 64 1283-1293
  • [5] Oxman AD(2011)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence–indirectness J Clin Epidemiol. 64 1303-1310
  • [6] Akl EA(2011)GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence–inconsistency J Clin Epidemiol. 64 1294-1302
  • [7] Guyatt GH(2011)GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence–publication bias J Clin Epidemiol. 64 1277-1282
  • [8] Oxman AD(2011)GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology J Clin Epidemiol 64 380-382
  • [9] Kunz R(2011)GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence J Clin Epidemiol. 64 1311-1316
  • [10] Guyatt GH(2011)GRADE guidelines: 4 Rating the quality of evidence–study limitations (risk of bias) J Clin Epidemiol. 64 407-415