Computed tomography imaging using split-bolus contrast injection with volume scan of aortic root and heart for preoperative evaluation of transcatheter aortic valve implantation

被引:0
|
作者
Hitomi Koyanagi
Yoshinori Tsutsumi
Yoshiyuki Tokuda
Akihito Tanaka
Maki Endo
Yasushi Furukawa
Shinji Abe
机构
[1] Nagoya University Hospital,Department of Radiological Technology
[2] Nagoya University Hospital,Department of Cardiac Surgery
[3] Nagoya University Hospital,Department of Cardiology
来源
Heart and Vessels | 2022年 / 37卷
关键词
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation; Split-bolus injection; Volume scan; Area detector CT; Coronary arteries; Aortic root;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to investigate using split-bolus contrast injection (SPBI) with volume scanning of the heart and aortic root with helical scanning of the access route, compared to single bolus contrast injection (SI) with variable helical pitch scanning (VHP) of the heart and aortic root and access route in a preoperative evaluation before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Thirty-five patients who underwent preoperative CT before TAVI using SPBI (contrast media: 24.5 mgI /kg/s, injected for 12 s for heart scan and then injected for 8 s for access route) were examined. Electrocardiogram (ECG) gated scans of the heart were performed by volume scan, after a period of time, non-gated helical scans of the aorto-iliac were performed (SPBI method). For comparison, 40 patients who had a single bolus injection (26.5 mg I/kg/s, injected for period of the scan time plus 3 s) and a VHP scan (SI method) before the SPBI method was performed were included in the study. The image qualities of the coronary arteries, aortic root, and access route (aorta-iliac), as well as radiation and iodine doses, were assessed. In visual assessment, image quality of coronary artery was significantly better with the SPBI method (grade; excellent: 57.1% in SPBI vs. 24.3% in SI, p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in image quality of the aortic root by visual assessment. The signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of coronary and aortic root were not significantly different between the two methods. The access route showed significantly higher SNR (45.7 ± 11.5 vs. 34.3 ± 9.8, p < 0.001) and CNR (36.0 ± 9.7 vs. 28.0 ± 8.8, p < 0.001) for the SPBI method. The SPBI method compared to SI method reduced iodine dose by 10% and radiation dose by 45%. Preoperative CT imaging before TAVI using SPBI with volume scan is useful and can reduce iodine and radiation doses.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 141
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Computed tomography imaging using split-bolus contrast injection with volume scan of aortic root and heart for preoperative evaluation of transcatheter aortic valve implantation
    Koyanagi, Hitomi
    Tsutsumi, Yoshinori
    Tokuda, Yoshiyuki
    Tanaka, Akihito
    Endo, Maki
    Furukawa, Yasushi
    Abe, Shinji
    HEART AND VESSELS, 2022, 37 (01) : 132 - 141
  • [2] Computed tomography evaluation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): Imaging of the aortic root and iliac arteries
    Schoenhagen, Paul
    Kapadia, Samir R.
    Halliburton, Sandra S.
    Svensson, Lars G.
    Tuzcu, E. Murat
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2011, 5 (05) : 293 - 300
  • [3] Evaluation of aortic root for definition of prosthesis size by magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac computed tomography: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation
    Ralf Koos
    Ertunc Altiok
    Andreas Horst Mahnken
    Mirja Neizel
    Guido Dohmen
    Nikolaus Marx
    Harald Kühl
    Rainer Hoffmann
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 13 (Suppl 1)
  • [4] Computed tomography in the evaluation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)
    Schoenhagen, Paul
    Hausleiter, Joerg
    Achenbach, Stephan
    Desai, Milind Y.
    Tuzcu, E. Murat
    CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2011, 1 (01) : 44 - 56
  • [5] Three-dimensional imaging of the aortic valve and aortic root with computed tomography: new standards in an era of transcatheter valve repair/implantation
    Schoenhagen, Paul
    Tuzcu, E. Murat
    Kapadia, Samir R.
    Desai, Milind Y.
    Svensson, Lars G.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2009, 30 (17) : 2079 - 2086
  • [6] Iodine contrast volume reduction in preoperative transcatheter aortic valve implantation computed tomography: Comparison with 64and 256-multidetector row computed tomography
    Yoshiura, T.
    Masuda, T.
    Kobayashi, Y.
    Kikuhara, Y.
    Ishibashi, T.
    Nonaka, H.
    Oku, T.
    Sato, T.
    Funama, Y.
    RADIOGRAPHY, 2024, 30 (01) : 408 - 415
  • [7] Cardiac computed tomography and computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of patients prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation
    Nguyen, Giang
    Leipsic, Jonathon
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 28 (05) : 497 - 504
  • [8] Manual versus automatic detection of aortic annulus plane in a computed tomography scan for transcatheter aortic valve implantation screeningaEuro
    Van Linden, Arnaud
    Kempfert, Joerg
    Blumenstein, Johannes
    Moellmann, Helge
    Kim, Won-Keun
    Alkaya, Serap
    Hamm, Christian
    Walther, Thomas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2014, 46 (02) : 207 - 212
  • [9] SCCT expert consensus document on computed tomography imaging before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)
    Achenbach, Stephan
    Delgado, Victoria
    Hausleiter, Joerg
    Schoenhagen, Paul
    Min, James K.
    Leipsic, Jonathon A.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2012, 6 (06) : 366 - 380
  • [10] Computed tomography assessment of the aortic root morphology in predicting the development of paravalvular leak following transcatheter aortic valve implantation
    Nieznanska, Malgorzata
    Zatorska, Karina
    Stoklosa, Patrycjusz
    Marzec, Karolina
    Misztal-Ogonowska, Malgorzata
    Kowalik, Ilona
    Dabrowski, Maciej
    Chmielak, Zbigniew
    Witkowski, Adam
    Hryniewiecki, Tomasz
    Michalowska, Ilona
    POLISH ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE-POLSKIE ARCHIWUM MEDYCYNY WEWNETRZNEJ, 2021, 131 (10):