Responses to the COVID-19 pandemic have impeded progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals

被引:0
作者
Cai Li
Zhongci Deng
Zhen Wang
Yuanchao Hu
Ling Wang
Shuxia Yu
Wei Li
Zhihua Shi
Brett A. Bryan
机构
[1] Huazhong Agricultural University,College of Resources and Environment
[2] Deakin University,School of Life and Environmental Sciences
[3] Huazhong Agricultural University,Interdisciplinary Research Center for Territorial Spatial Governance and Green Development
[4] Wuhan University,School of Resources and Environmental Sciences
[5] CAS Center for Excellence in Quaternary Science and Global Change,undefined
来源
Communications Earth & Environment | / 4卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
COVID-19 pandemic responses have brought unprecedented challenges to the United Nations 2030 Agenda for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and a quantitative, multi-dimensional assessment of the impacts of these responses on SDG progress is required. Here, we use an adaptive multi-regional input–output model to quantitatively assess the impact of pandemic responses on global and national SDG progress and show that COVID-19 pandemic responses reduced overall progress towards the SDGs by 8.2%, with socio-economic sustainability declining by 18.1% while environmental sustainability improved by 5.1% compared with the business-as-usual trend. Developing countries suffered greater reductions in overall sustainability (9.7%) than developed countries (7.1%). Under all post-pandemic futures, pandemic responses were found to impede overall progress towards the SDGs and worsened inequality between countries, particularly for socio-economic targets. A post-pandemic strategy toward the SDGs requires sustainable pandemic responses which not only address inequality among countries but also lessen the trade-offs between SDGs.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 84 条
[31]  
Hastuti SH(2008)An adaptive regional input-output model and its application to the assessment of the economic cost of Katrina Risk Anal 28 S359-undefined
[32]  
Saputri NK(2021)Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on human–nature interactions: Pathways, evidence and implications People Nat 3 448-undefined
[33]  
Syaifudin N(2020)Will COVID-19 fiscal recovery packages accelerate or retard progress on climate change? Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy 36 226-undefined
[34]  
Bryan BA(2020)Ensuring a post-COVID economic agenda tackles global biodiversity loss One Earth 3 181-undefined
[35]  
Hadjikakou M(2017)Income projections for climate change research: a framework based on human capital dynamics Glob. Environ. Chang. 42 153-undefined
[36]  
Moallemi EA(2017)The human core of the shared socioeconomic pathways: population scenarios by age, sex and level of education for all countries to 2100 Glob. Environ. Chang. 42 20-undefined
[37]  
Barbier EB(2017)The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview Glob. Environ. Chang. 42 1-undefined
[38]  
Burgess JC(2013)Building Eora: a global multi-region input-output database at high country and sector resolution Econ. Syst. Res. 25 undefined-undefined
[39]  
Shulla K(2020)Development of the air pollution database for the GTAP 10A data base development of the air pollution database for the GTAP data base version 10A Gtap Res. Memo. 33 undefined-undefined
[40]  
Fagbemi F(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined