Grammar and Pragmatics in the Acquisition of Article Systems

被引:1
作者
Jeannette Schaeffer
Lisa Matthewson
机构
[1] Ben-Gurion University of the Negev,Department of Foreign Literatures and Linguistics
[2] University of British Columbia,Department of Linguistics
来源
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory | 2005年 / 23卷
关键词
Artificial Intelligence; Common Ground; Target Language; Language Acquisition; Belief State;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper provides an analysis of articles in two unrelated languages: St’át’imcets (Lillooet Salish) and English child language. The article systems in these two languages display striking parallels, diverging in similar ways from that of English adult language. Our analysis involves a parametric difference between English and St’át’imcets. While in English adult language, article distinctions rely on the state of the common ground between speaker and hearer, in St’át’imcets they rely on speaker beliefs. Despite the similarities between the patterns of article use in St’át’imcets and child English, we propose that English-acquiring children set the parameter correctly for the English value very early, but that they initially lack a pragmatic concept requiring them to distinguish systematically between their own beliefs and the belief state of their interlocutor. This neutralizes the distinction between the two parameter values, causing the article system of English-speaking children to optionally resemble that of St’át’imcets adults. In terms of language acquisition theory, our study supports a revised version of the Strong Continuity Hypothesis, according to which children obey all principles of Universal Grammar and set parameters as soon as the relevant input is available. Any structures deviating from target language structures result from an immature pragmatic system.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 101
页数:48
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Enç Mürvet(1991)‘The Semantics of Specificity’ Linguistic Inquiry 22 1-25
  • [2] Fukui Naoko(1986)‘Specifiers and Projections’ MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 8 128-172
  • [3] Speas Margaret(1991) ‘On (In)definiteness and Articles: Implicatures and (Un)grammaticality Prediction’ Journal of Linguistics 27 405-442
  • [4] Hawkins John(1985)‘Language and Cognitive Processes from a Developmental Perspective’ Language and Cognitive Processes 1 61-85
  • [5] Karmiloff-Smith Annette(1994)‘Reference and Proper Names: A Theory of N-Movement in Syntax and Logical Form’ Linguistic Inquiry 25 609-665
  • [6] Longobardi Giuseppe(1974)‘Preschool Children’s Use of Definite and Indefinite Articles’ Child Development 45 446-455
  • [7] Maratsos Michael(1999)‘On the Interpretation of Wide-Scope Indefinites’ Natural Language Semantics 7 79-134
  • [8] Matthewson Lisa(1993)‘The Full Competence Hypothesis of Clause Structure in Early German’ Language 69 1-33
  • [9] Poeppel David(1990)‘Catapults and Pendulums: The Mechanisms of Language Acquisition’ Linguistics 28 1381-1406
  • [10] Wexler Kenneth(1998)Very Early Parameter Setting and the Unique Checking Constraint: A New Explanation of the Optional Infinitive Stage Lingua 106 23-79