System size, energy, centrality and pseudorapidity dependence of charged-particle density in Au+Au and Cu+Cu collisions at RHIC

被引:0
作者
G. I. Veres
机构
[1] Eötvös Loránd University,Department of Atomic Physics
[2] Massachusetts Institute of Technology,Laboratory for Nuclear Science
来源
Indian Journal of Physics | 2011年 / 85卷
关键词
Particle production;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Charged particle pseudorapidity distributions are presented from the PHOBOS experiment at RHIC, measured in Au+Au and Cu+Cu collisions at \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$\sqrt {s_{NN} } $\end{document} =19.6, 22.4, 62.4, 130 and 200 GeV, as a function of collision centrality. The presentation includes the recently analyzed Cu+Cu data at 22.4 GeV. The measurements were made by the same detector setup over a broad range in pseudorapidity, |η| < 5.4, allowing for a reliable systematic study of particle production as a function of energy, centrality and system size. Comparing Cu+Cu and Au+Au results, we find that the total number of produced charged particles and the overall shape (height and width) of the pseudorapidity distributions are determined by the number of nucleon participants, Npart. Detailed comparisons reveal that the matching of the shape of the Cu+Cu and Au+Au pseudorapidity distributions over the full range of η is better for the same Npart/2A value than for the same Npart value, where A denotes the mass number. In other words, it is the geometry of the nuclear overlap zone, rather than just the number of nucleon participants that drives the detailed shape of the pseudorapidity distribution and its centrality dependence.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
Alver B.(2009)undefined Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 142301-undefined
[2]  
Bearden I. G.(2002)undefined Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 202301-undefined
[3]  
Back B. B.(2003)undefined Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 052303-undefined
[4]  
Back B. B.(2003)undefined Nucl. Instr. Meth. A499 603-undefined
[5]  
Back B. B.(2001)undefined Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 102303-undefined
[6]  
Back B. B.(2006)undefined Phys. Rev. C74 021901-undefined
[7]  
Back B. B.(2005)undefined Phys. Rev. C72 031901(R)-undefined