Upriver transport of dissolved substances in an estuary and sub-estuary system of the lower James River, Chesapeake Bay

被引:0
作者
Bo Hong
Jian Shen
Hongzhou Xu
机构
[1] South China University of Technology,School of Civil and Transportation Engineering
[2] College of William & Mary,Virginia Institute of Marine Science
[3] Chinese Academy of Sciences,Institute of Deep
来源
Frontiers of Earth Science | 2018年 / 12卷
关键词
transport process; physical forcing; numerical modeling; estuary; Chesapeake Bay;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The water exchange between the James River and the Elizabeth River, an estuary and sub-estuary system in the lower Chesapeake Bay, was investigated using a 3D numerical model. The conservative passive tracers were used to represent the dissolved substances (DS) discharged from the Elizabeth River. The approach enabled us to diagnose the underlying physical processes that control the expansion of the DS, which is representative of potential transport of harmful algae blooms, pollutants from the Elizabeth River to the James River without explicitly simulating biological processes. Model simulations with realistic forcings in 2005, together with a series of processoriented numerical experiments, were conducted to explore the correlations of the transport process and external forcing. Model results show that the upriver transport depends highly on the freshwater discharge on a seasonal scale and maximum upriver transport occurs in summer with a mean transport time ranging from 15–30 days. The southerly/easterly wind, low river discharge, and neap tidal condition all act to strengthen the upriver transport. On the other hand, the northerly/westerly wind, river pulse, water level pulse, and spring tidal condition act to inhibit the upriver transport. Tidal flushing plays an important role in transporting the DS during spring tide, which shortens the travel time in the lower James River. The multivariable regression analysis of volume mean subtidal DS concentration in the mesohaline portion of the James River indicates that DS concentration in the upriver area can be explained and well predicted by the physical forcings (r = 0.858, p = 0.00001).
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 599
页数:16
相关论文
共 90 条
[21]  
Wang D(2004)Calculating age and residence time in the tidal York River using three-dimensional model experiments Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 61 449-112
[22]  
Li H(2006)Modeling study of the influences of tide and stratification on age of water in the tidal James River Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 68 101-3424
[23]  
Xu H(2000)Fortnightly variability in the transverse dynamics of a coastal plain estuary J Geophys Res 105 3413-232
[24]  
Hong B(1978)Nontidal variability in the Chesapeake Bay and the Potomac River, evidence for nonlocal forcing J Phys Oceanogr 8 225-354
[25]  
Panday N(2005)Numerical modeling of an estuary: a comprehensive skill assessment J Geophys Res 110 C05001-1668
[26]  
Shen J(1976)Velocity observations in the west passage of Narragansett Bay: a partially mixed estuary J Phys Oceanogr 6 345-10597
[27]  
Wang H V(2002)On the wind-induced exchange between Indian River Bay, Delaware and the adjacent continental shelf Cont Shelf Res 22 1651-498
[28]  
Gong W(1984)Observations of wind-induced subtidal variability inthe Delaware estuary J Geophys Res 89 10589-194
[29]  
Soehl A(2002)On the relative importance of the remote and local wind effects on the subtidal exchange at the entrance to the Chesapeake Bay J Mar Res 60 477-709
[30]  
Hong B(1981)On the validation of models Physical Geography 2 184-84