Reducing Overcapacity in China’s Coal Industry: A Real Option Approach

被引:0
作者
Wei Wu
Boqiang Lin
机构
[1] Xiamen University,The School of Economics, China Center for Energy Economics Research
[2] Xiamen University,School of Management, China Institute for Studies in Energy Policy, Collaborative Innovation Center for Energy Economics and Energy Policy
来源
Computational Economics | 2020年 / 55卷
关键词
Coal industry; Reduction of overcapacity; Real options; Monte Carlo simulation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Coal accounts for more than 60% of China’s primary energy consumption. Due to the demand decline since 2013, the coal industry was facing the dilemmas of falling prices, overcapacity, and high debt ratios. Reduction of overcapacity of the coal industry has become a crucial task in China’s supply-side structural reform. This paper attempts to explain several issues related to overcapacity reduction in the coal industry. First, we analyze the characteristics of China’s coal market and the causes of over-capacity in the coal industry. It is revealed that the aggregate coal demand of China is price inelastic, and the coal enterprises own market power. In addition, we illustrate that current overcapacity is the result of enterprises’ rational expansion in the context of rapid growth in demand in the previous period. Second, different capacity reduction schemes are compared. The results suggest that some of the inefficient production capacity should be temporarily withdrawn from the market, rather than ordering all coal mine to limit production capacity in the same proportion. Third, we conduct a regression model to describe the long-term price trend of coal and establish a mean-reverting model to simulate the motion path of the coal price. According to the Monte Carlo simulation, we estimate the value of the real option of coal capacity and find it is higher than the capacity replacement cost. This demonstrates that the real option is economically feasible in application.
引用
收藏
页码:1073 / 1093
页数:20
相关论文
共 91 条
  • [1] Bernanke B(1996)The financial accelerator and the flight to quality The Review of Economics and Statistics 78 1-15
  • [2] Gertler M(1975)Technology, prices, and the derived demand for energy The Review of Economics and Statistics 57 259-268
  • [3] Gilchrist S(2017)Robust Monte Carlo method for R&D real options valuation Computational Economics 49 481-498
  • [4] Berndt ER(1979)Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root Journal of the American Statistical Association 74 427-431
  • [5] Wood DO(2017)Coal price fluctuation mechanism in China based on system dynamics model Natural Hazards 85 1151-1167
  • [6] Biancardi M(2018)A decomposition analysis of energy-related CO Journal of Cleaner Production 184 1102-1112
  • [7] Villani G(2017) emissions in Chinese six high-energy intensive industries Climate Policy 17 423-442
  • [8] Dickey DA(2017)China’s changing economy: Implications for its carbon dioxide emissions International Journal Of Environmental Research and Public Health 14 1509-175
  • [9] Fuller WA(1931)Pollution emissions, environmental policy, and marginal abatement costs Journal of Political Economy 39 137-222
  • [10] Ding Z(2014)The economics of exhaustible resources Nature 514 218-3