Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a clinical comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone single bundle versus semitendinosus and gracilis double bundle technique

被引:0
作者
Patrick Sadoghi
Peter E. Müller
Volkmar Jansson
Martin van Griensven
Albert Kröpfl
Martin F. Fischmeister
机构
[1] Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Campus Grosshadern
[2] AUVA Traumacenter Unfallkrankenhaus Linz,undefined
[3] Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology,undefined
[4] AUVA Research Center,undefined
[5] Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration,undefined
来源
International Orthopaedics | 2011年 / 35卷
关键词
Anterior Cruciate Ligament; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction; Pivot Shift; Anterior Knee Pain; Pivot Shift Test;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The study hypothesis was that the outcome of semitendinosus gracilis double bundle (STG-DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is advantageous in terms of clinical results and restoration of anterior-posterior and rotational laxity in comparison to bone-patellar tendon-bone single-bundle (PTB-SB) ACL reconstruction. We analysed 41 PTB-SB and 51 STG-DB patients using the Tegner, IKDC and WOMAC scores preoperatively and at a minimum follow-up of two years. At follow-up, there was no significant difference in the clinical scores. The KT 1000 side-to-side measurement showed no significant difference between groups. The STG-DB group was significantly superior in terms of the pivot-shift sign and anterior knee pain. We conclude that the outcome of STG-DB reconstruction in the mid-term was not advantageous in terms of clinical scores and anterior-posterior laxity evaluated by the KT 1000. Nevertheless, the restored rotational laxity measured by the pivot shift test was significantly superior in the STG-DB technique.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 133
页数:6
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]  
Gabriel MT(2004)Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads J Orthop Res 22 85-89
[2]  
Wong EK(2005)Evidence-based orthopaedic surgery: what type of research will best improve clinical practice? J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 1593-1594
[3]  
Woo SL(2004)Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone-patellar tendon-bone compared with double semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts. A prospective randomized clinical trial J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A 2143-2155
[4]  
Yagi M(2005)Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries part 2 Am J Sports Med 33 1751-1767
[5]  
Debski RE(2008)Prospective randomized comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Arthroscopy 24 137-145
[6]  
Carr AJ(2009)Anterior-posterior and rotatory stability of single and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions J Bone Joint Surg Am 91 107-118
[7]  
Aglietti P(2001)A comparison of quadruple semitendinosus and patellar tendon grafts in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament J Bone Joint Surg Br 83 348-354
[8]  
Giron F(1993)A comparison of doubled semitendinosus/gracilis and central thirds patellar tendon autografts in arthropscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Arthroscopy 9 143-148
[9]  
Buzzi R(1985)Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries Clin Orthop Relat Res 198 43-49
[10]  
Biddau F(1988)Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient-relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee J Rheumatol 15 1833-1840