Risk factors for subsidence in anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages: a review of 82 cases and 182 levels

[11] Mhanna N(2012)A preliminary study of three and four levels degenerative cervical spondylosis treated with peek cages and anterior cervical plate J Med Assoc Thai 95 909-916

[12] Viljoen S(2004)Use of cervical stand-alone cages Eur Spine J 13 474-475

[13] Torner J(2003)Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning Eur Spine J 12 513-516

[14] Hitchon P(2008)Comparative biomechanical study of cervical spine stabilisation by cage alone, cage with plate, or plate-cage: a porcine model J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 16 9-13

[15] Gebremariam L(2014)Impact of subsidence on clinical outcomes and radiographic fusion rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review J Spinal Disord Tech 27 1-10

[16] Koes BW(2012)Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone cages BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13 172-1546

[17] Peul WC(2013)Comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in the surgical treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective, randomized, control study with over 7-year follow-up Eur Spine J 22 1539-346

[18] Huisstede BM(2010)Comparison of fusion with cage alone and plate instrumentation in two-level cervical degenerative disease J Korean Neurosurg Soc 48 342-796

[19] Jacobs W(2009)Preliminary comparison of radiolucent cages containing either autogenous cancellous bone or hydroxyapatite graft in multilevel cervical fusion J Clin Neurosci 16 793-617

[20] Willems PC(1958)The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks J Neurosurg 15 602-745

[11] Mhanna N(2012)A preliminary study of three and four levels degenerative cervical spondylosis treated with peek cages and anterior cervical plate J Med Assoc Thai 95 909-916

[12] Viljoen S(2004)Use of cervical stand-alone cages Eur Spine J 13 474-475

[13] Torner J(2003)Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning Eur Spine J 12 513-516

[14] Hitchon P(2008)Comparative biomechanical study of cervical spine stabilisation by cage alone, cage with plate, or plate-cage: a porcine model J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 16 9-13

[15] Gebremariam L(2014)Impact of subsidence on clinical outcomes and radiographic fusion rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review J Spinal Disord Tech 27 1-10

[16] Koes BW(2012)Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone cages BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13 172-1546

[17] Peul WC(2013)Comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in the surgical treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective, randomized, control study with over 7-year follow-up Eur Spine J 22 1539-346

[18] Huisstede BM(2010)Comparison of fusion with cage alone and plate instrumentation in two-level cervical degenerative disease J Korean Neurosurg Soc 48 342-796

[19] Jacobs W(2009)Preliminary comparison of radiolucent cages containing either autogenous cancellous bone or hydroxyapatite graft in multilevel cervical fusion J Clin Neurosci 16 793-617

[20] Willems PC(1958)The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks J Neurosurg 15 602-745