Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomize clinical study

被引:0
作者
Timo Järvelä
机构
[1] Hatanpää Hospital,Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
[2] Sports Clinic and Hospital Mehiläinen,undefined
来源
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | 2007年 / 15卷
关键词
Anterior cruciate ligament; Double bundle technique; Prospective randomize study;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Anatomical observation and biomechanical studies have shown that the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) mainly consists of two distinct bundles, the anteromedial (AM) bundle and posterolateral (PL) bundle. Conventional single-bundle ACL reconstruction techniques have focused on the restoration of the AM bundle while giving limited attention to the PL bundle. The purpose of this prospective, randomized clinical study is to compare the outcomes of ACL reconstruction when using either double-bundle or single-bundle technique and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation, and similar rehabilitation with both techniques. Sixty-five patients were randomized into either double-bundle (n = 35) or single-bundle (n = 30) ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendons and bioabsorbable screw (Hexalon, Inion Company, Tampere, Finland) fixation in both groups. The evaluation methods were clinical examination, KT-1000 arthrometer measurements, radiographic evaluation, as well as International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm knee scores. There were no differences between the study groups preoperatively. For an average of 14 months of follow-up (range 12–20 months), 30 patients of the double-bundle group and 29 patients of the single-bundle group were available (91%). At the follow-up, the rotational stability, as evaluated by pivot shift test, was significantly better in the double-bundle group than in the single-bundle group. However, in anterior stability of the knee, there was no significant difference between the groups. None of the patients in the double-bundle group had graft failure, while four patients in the single-bundle group had. In addition, knee scores were equal at the follow-up, and all the results were significantly better at the follow-up than preoperatively, in both groups.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 507
页数:7
相关论文
共 127 条
[1]  
Adachi N(2004)Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Single- versus double-bundle multistranded hamstring tendons J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 515-520
[2]  
Ochi M(1991)Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Fibre bundle actions related to ligament replacements and injuries J Bone Joint Surg Br 73 260-267
[3]  
Uchio Y(2005)Arthroscopic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an anatomic approach Arthroscopy 21 1275-726
[4]  
Iwasa J(1985)Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee J Bone Joint Surg Am 67 720-130
[5]  
Kuriwaka M(2000)Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part II. Operative procedures and clinical correlations Am J Sports Med 28 124-89
[6]  
Ito Y(2004)Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads J Orthop Res 22 85-231
[7]  
Amis AA(1975)The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint. Anatomical, functional and experimental analysis Clin Orthop 106 216-807
[8]  
Dawkins GP(2001)Single- versus bi-socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous multiple-stranded hamstring tendons with endobutton femoral fixation. A prospective study Arthroscopy 17 801-864
[9]  
Cha PS(2000)Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using a double-bundle Arthroscopy 16 860-749
[10]  
Brucker PU(1999)Quantitative analysis of human cruciate ligament insertions Arthroscopy 15 741-242