Evaluation of the impact of addition of PET to CT and MR scanning in the staging of patients with head and neck carcinomas

被引:0
作者
Maky A. Hafidh
Peter D. Lacy
Joe P. Hughes
George Duffy
Conrad V. Timon
机构
[1] St James’s Hospital,Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
[2] Blackrock Clinic,Department of Nuclear Medicine
来源
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head & Neck | 2006年 / 263卷
关键词
PET; Squamous cell carcinoma; Head and neck; Staging; SUV;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The addition of whole body positron emission tomography (PET) to the investigation of patients with newly diagnosed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) was assessed over a 6-month period. Staging investigations included laryngoscopy, oesophagoscopy, CXR, CT and MRI. In addition, all patients had an extended-field (whole body) FDG-PET scan and were restaged. Standardised Uptake Values (SUV) were used to measure FDG uptake. SUV levels above 5 were considered indicative of the presence of tumour, values below 3 indicative of benign aetiology and values equal to and between 3 and 5 were considered equivocal. Forty-eight consecutive patients with biopsy proven HNSCC were included for study. Three patients presenting with neck disease had unknown primary tumours. Of the remaining 45 patients, CT scan correctly identified 40 of the primary tumours (89%). MRI and PET both identified 41 primary tumours (91%). Thirty-two patients underwent neck dissection. Of these patients 12 had pathologically N0 necks and 20 had positive nodal disease. CT scan and MRI each correctly staged pN0 necks in 10 of 12 patients (83%) whereas PET alone had a lower true negative rate of 8 out of 12 patients (67%). PET correctly staged the N+ necks in 14/20 patients (70%) versus 12/20 (60%) for MRI, and 8/20 (40%) for CT alone. All four patients who were judged to have distant metastases by PET had these metastases deemed negative by other investigation. None of the three imaging modalities was able to identify the tumour site in the three patients with unknown primaries. In conclusion, although PET has got a higher sensitivity in detecting nodal disease, it has only slightly improved the classification of N+ necks. The findings of this study cast doubt on the merit of routine addition of PET to the current investigative protocols for HNSCC patients.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 175 条
  • [1] Aassar OS(1999)Metastatic head and neck cancer: role and usefulness ofFDG PET in locating occult primary tumours Radiology 210 177-181
  • [2] Fischbein NJ(2005)Assessment of cervical lymph node metastasis with different imaging methods in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma J Otolaryngol 34 384-394
  • [3] Caputo GR(2003)Prediction of outcome in head-and-neck cancer patients using the standardized uptake value of 2-[ Phys 59 1295-1300
  • [4] Kaplan MJ(1994)f]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose. Int J Radiat Onco Biol BMJ 309 188-189
  • [5] Price DC(1996)Diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic plots Head Neck 18 545-551
  • [6] Singer MI(1992)Palpation, ultrasound, and ultrasound- guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in the assessment of cervical lymph node status in head and neck cancer patients Laryngoscope 102 281-288
  • [7] Dillon WP(1995)Positron emission tomography: A new precise imaging modality for detection of primary head and neck tumours and assessment of cervical adenopathy Laryngoscope 105 135-139
  • [8] Hawkins RA(1995)The use of positron emission tomography for early detection of recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in postradiotherapy patients J Nucl Med 36 211-216
  • [9] Akogula E(2005)Detection of lymph node metastases of squamous cell cancer of head and neck with FDG-PET and MRI Radiology 235 580-586
  • [10] Dutipek M(2003)Head and neck malignancy: is PET/CT more accurate than PET or CT alone? Head Neck 25 138-145