Assessing process capability index using sampling plan in the presence of measurement system errors

被引:0
作者
Adel Brik
Mohamed Goddi
Jamel Dhahri
Nabil Ben Fredj
机构
[1] Université de Tunis,Laboratoire de Mécanique, Matériaux et Procédés (LR99ES05), ENSIT
[2] Ecole Supérieure Privée d’Ingénierie et de Technologie,undefined
[3] ESPRIT,undefined
来源
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology | 2019年 / 102卷
关键词
Process capability index ; Measurement system error; GR&R; Threshold value of ; Sampling plan parameters;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Measurement system errors impact the collected data used to evaluate the process capability. The work developed in this paper aims at integrating these errors in the calculation of the threshold value of Cpused for making the decision about the process capability Cp0∗\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \left({C}_{p0}^{\ast}\right) $$\end{document} and to propose a procedure that corrects the parameters of the sampling plan used to estimate this capability index. An expression of Cp0∗\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ {C}_{p0}^{\ast } $$\end{document}that depends on the gauge repeatability and reproducibility (GR&R), errors type I and type II, the capability index corresponding to the rejectable quality level (CpRQL), and to the acceptable quality level (CpAQL) was developed. The effects of these parameters and their relative interactions on the difference between capability index calculations with and without integrating the measurement system error (ΔCpthreshold) and the corresponding difference in the parts per million of defects ppm (Δppm) were assessed using a response surface design. It was found that the integration of the measurement system error is essential particularly when the difference between CpAQL and CpRQL is small. Concerning the correction of the sampling plan parameters, a procedure was developed to integrate the measurement system error evaluated by the GR&R. This procedure guarantees a common decision concerning the process capability whatever the state of the measurement system is, and this decision would, therefore, depend on the sample quality only.
引用
收藏
页码:3301 / 3313
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
De-Felipe D(2017)Monitoring high complex production processes using process capability indices Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93 1257-1267
[2]  
Benedito E(2008)Basic process capability indices: an expository review Int Stat Rev 76 347-367
[3]  
Anis MZ(1986)Process capability indices J Qual Technol 18 41-52
[4]  
Kane VE(2016)On some subtle misconceptions about process capability indices Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87 3019-3029
[5]  
Anis MZ(2017)A review of univariate and multivariate process capability indices Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92 1687-1705
[6]  
Md T(2017)Residuals based process capability indices for two-stage processes J Ind Eng Int 13 239-247
[7]  
De-Felipe D(2016)Performance evaluation of processes with asymmetric tolerances in the presence of gauge measurement errors Comm Stat -Theo Meth 45 3011-3026
[8]  
Benedito E(2017)Variable sampling plan for resubmitted lots based on process capability index and Bayesian approach Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88 2547-2555
[9]  
Nikzad E(2013)Variable sampling inspection for resubmitted lots based on process capability index Cpk for normally distributed items App Math Mod 37 667-675
[10]  
Amiri A(2014)A resubmitted sampling scheme by variables inspection for controlling lot fraction nonconforming Int J Prod Res 52 3744-3754