Validity of Prepregnancy Weight Status Estimated from Self-reported Height and Weight

被引:0
作者
Dayeon Shin
Hwan Chung
Lorraine Weatherspoon
Won O. Song
机构
[1] Michigan State University,Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition
[2] Korea University,Department of Statistics
来源
Maternal and Child Health Journal | 2014年 / 18卷
关键词
Validity; Self-reports; Prepregnancy weight status;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Institute of Medicine’s gestational weight gain guidelines are intended to reduce pregnancy complications, poor birth outcomes and excessive postpartum weight retention. The specific weight gain guidelines vary by prepregnancy weight status. We evaluated the validity of prepregnancy weight status (underweight, normal weight, overweight and obesity) classified from self-reported prepregnancy height and weight in reference to those from measured data during the first trimester of pregnancy and imputed data for both pregnant and age-matched non-pregnant women included in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003–2006. Self-reported prepregnancy weight status was validated by two ideal references: imputed data with the number of imputations as 10 (n = 5,040) using the data of age-matched non-pregnant women who had both self-reported and measured data, and weight status based on height and weight measured during the first trimester (n = 95). Mean differences, Pearson’s correlations (r), and Kappa statistics (κ) were used to examine the strength of agreement between self-reported data and the two reference measures. Mean (standard error of the mean) differences between self-reported versus imputed prepregnancy weight was −1.7 (0.1) kg with an r = 0.98 (p < 0.001), and κ = 0.78 which indicate substantial agreement for the 504 pregnant women. Mean (SEM) differences between self-reported prepregnancy weight versus measured weight in the first trimester was −2.3 (0.7) kg with r = 0.98 (p < 0.001), and κ = 0.76, which also showed substantial agreements in 95 pregnant women. Prepregnancy weight status classified based on self-reported prepregnancy height and weight was valid.
引用
收藏
页码:1667 / 1674
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Spencer EA(2002)Validity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 EPIC-Oxford participants Public Health Nutrition 5 561-565
[2]  
Appleby PN(2011)Validity of self-reported height and weight in a Korean population Journal of Epidemiology 21 30-36
[3]  
Davey GK(2007)The validity of obesity based on self-reported weight and height: Implications for population studies Obesity (Silver Spring) 15 197-208
[4]  
Lee DH(2006)A comparison of national estimates of obesity prevalence from the behavioral risk factors surveillance system and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey International Journal of Obesity 30 164-170
[5]  
Shin A(2010)Agreement between self-reported and measured height, weight, and body mass index in old age: A longitudinal study with 20 years of follow up Age and Ageing 39 445-451
[6]  
Kim J(2010)Gestational weight gain and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus Obstetrics and Gynecology 115 597-604
[7]  
Nyholm M(2011)Reliability and validity of birth certificate prepregnancy weight and height among women enrolled in prenatal WIC program: Florida, 2005 Maternal and Child Health Journal 15 851-859
[8]  
Gullberg B(2009)Accuracy of body mass index categories based on self-reported height and weight among women in the United States Maternal and Child Health Journal 13 489-496
[9]  
Merlo J(2003)Modifiable behavioral factors in a biopsychosocial model predict inadequate and excessive gestational weight gain Journal of American Dietetic Association 103 48-54
[10]  
Yun S(2006)Effects of gestational weight gain and body mass index on obstetric outcome in Sweden International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 93 269-274