Photopic and scotopic VEPs in patients with congenital stationary night-blindness

被引：0

作者：

Kubová Z. ^{[1
,3
]}

Kremláček J. ^{[1
]}

Kuba M. ^{[1
]}

Chlubnová J. ^{[1
]}

Svěrák J. ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague

[2] Univ. Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Králové

[3] Department of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, 500 38 Hradec Králové

来源：

Documenta Ophthalmologica | 2004年 / 109卷 / 1期

关键词：

Congenital stationary night-blindness; Motion-onset VEPs; Pattern-reversal VEPs; Scotopic VEPs;

D O I：

10.1007/s10633-004-2435-8

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Extended set of visual evoked potentials (VEPs) using pattern-reversal (PREPs), linear motion-onset and radial (expansion) motion-onset stimuli (M-VEPs) (detailed specification at http://www.lfhk.cuni.cz/elf) was used to verify congenital stationary night-blindness (CSNB) characteristics in 7 patients (compared to 7 age matched controls) in photopic conditions (luminance of 17 cd/m2). No differences were found in any of the M-VEPs, whilst PREPs displayed prolonged latencies in 3 of 7 CSNB patients. Additionally, the PREPs and M-VEPs were tested in 3 normal and 3 CSNB subjects (the only available ones from the original group) over large range of scotopic, mesopic and photopic luminances (from 0.0001 to 65.4 cd/m2). Both types of low luminance VEPs had distinctly increased luminance threshold needed for reliable VEPs eliciting in CSNB patients (0.06 cd/m2); the VEP appearance threshold was almost identical with the perceptual threshold in both groups. Thus, our pilot study proved that CSNB can be objectively detected also via scotopic VEP examination. Since the prolonged PREP latencies at 17 cd/m2normalised with luminance increase, it indicates that the lower luminance stimuli (compared to the standard recommended by ISCEV) can be more sensitive for some visual disorders detection. © 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

引用

页码：9 / 15

页数：6

共 16 条

[1]

Myiake Y., Yagasaki K., Horiguschi M., Kawase Y., On- and off-responses in photopic electroretionogram in complete and incomplete types of congenital stationary night blindness, Jpn. J. Ophthalmol., 31, pp. 81-87, (1987)

[2]

Miyake Y., Horiguchi M., Ota I., Shiroyama N., Characteristic ERG-flicker anomaly in incomplete congenital stationary night blindness, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 28, pp. 1816-1823, (1987)

[3]

Barnes C.S., Alexander K.R., Fishman G., A distinctive form of congenital stationary nightblindness with cone on-pathway dysfunction, Ophthalmology, 109, pp. 575-583, (2002)

[4]

Benedek G., Janaky M., Adamkovich N., Rubiczech G., Sary G., Scotopic pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials, Clin. Vis. Sci., 8, pp. 47-54, (1992)

[5]

Benedek G., Benedek K., Keri S., Letoha T., Janaky M., Human scotopic spatiotemporal sensitivity: A comparison of psychophysical and electrophysiological data, Doc. Ophthalmol., 106, pp. 201-207, (2003)

[6]

Kuba M., Kubova Z., Visual evoked potentials specific for motion-onset, Doc. Ophthalmol., 80, pp. 83-89, (1992)

[7]

Hoffmann M.B., Unsold A.S., Bach M., Directional tuning of human motion adaptation as reflected by the motion VEP, Vis. Res., 40, pp. 2187-2194, (2001)

[8]

Wolf J., Arden G., Selective magnocellular damage in melanoma associated retinopathy: Comparison with congenital stationary nightblindness, Vision Res., 36, pp. 236-279, (1996)

[9]

Odom V., Bach M., Barber C., Bridgell M., Marmor M., Tormene A.P., Holder G., Vaeghan A., Visual Evoked Potentials Standard, (2004)

[10]

Cant B.R., Hume A.L., Shaw N.A., Effects of luminance on the pattern visual evoked potential in multiple sclerosis, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 45, pp. 496-504, (1978)

← 1 2 →