Characteristics and behaviour of screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison with symptomatic patients

被引:0
作者
Valerie Cui Yun Koh
Jeffrey Chun Tatt Lim
Aye Aye Thike
Poh Yian Cheok
Minn Minn Myint Thu
Veronique Kiak Mien Tan
Benita Kiat Tee Tan
Kong Wee Ong
Gay Hui Ho
Wai Jin Tan
Yongcheng Tan
Ahmed Syed Salahuddin
Inny Busmanis
Angela Pek Yoon Chong
Jabed Iqbal
Shyamala Thilagaratnam
Jill Su Lin Wong
Puay Hoon Tan
机构
[1] Singapore General Hospital,Department of Pathology
[2] National Cancer Centre Singapore,Division of Surgical Oncology
[3] Singapore General Hospital,Department of General Surgery
[4] Health Promotion Board,Regional Health & Community Outreach Division
[5] Singapore,Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Tahir Foundation Building
[6] National University of Singapore,Division of Oncologic Imaging
[7] National Cancer Centre Singapore,Department of Anatomy
[8] Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine,undefined
[9] National University of Singapore,undefined
[10] Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School Singapore,undefined
来源
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2015年 / 152卷
关键词
DCIS; Screen detected; Symptomatic; Immunohistochemistry; Clinicopathological parameters; Recurrence; Survival;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in Singapore women. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is the putative, non-obligate precursor of the majority of invasive breast cancers. The efficacy of the Singapore breast-screening pilot project in detecting early stage breast cancer led to the launch of a national breast-screening programme, BreastScreen Singapore (BSS), in January 2002. In this study, we compared clinicopathological and immunohistochemical characteristics, as well as clinical outcomes, between screen-detected and symptomatic DCIS. The study cohort comprised 1202 cases of DCIS diagnosed at Singapore General Hospital from 1994 to 2010. Comparison of clinicopathological parameters, immunohistochemical results of ER, PR, HER2, CK14, EGFR, and 34βE12, and clinical outcomes was carried out between the 2 groups. Amongst 1202 cases, 610 (50.7 %) were screen-detected and 592 (49.3 %) were symptomatic DCIS. Screen-detected cases were smaller in size (P < 0.001), of lower nuclear grade (P = 0.004), and more frequently expressed ER (P < 0.001). Luminal A phenotype was more frequently observed in screen-detected DCIS, while triple-negative and HER2 phenotypes were more common in symptomatic DCIS (P < 0.001). The basal-like phenotype was also more frequent in symptomatic DCIS (P = 0.041). Mean and median follow-up was 99.7 and 97.8 months, respectively, with a maximum follow-up of 246.0 months. More symptomatic patients developed invasive recurrences compared to screen-detected patients (P = 0.001). A trend for better disease-free survival was observed in screen-detected patients (P = 0.076). Patients who were screen-detected experienced better overall survival than those with symptomatic DCIS (P = 0.007). Our data indicate a more favourable outcome of screen-detected DCIS patients confirming the role of BSS in early identification of this curable disease.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 304
页数:11
相关论文
共 310 条
[31]  
Tabar L(2005)The natural history of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in women treated by biopsy only revealed over 30 years of long-term follow-up Cancer 239 1863-1867
[32]  
Vitak B(1978)Intraductal carcinoma. Long-term follow-up after treatment by biopsy alone JAMA 96 906-920
[33]  
Smith RA(2004)Ductal carcinoma in situ, complexities and challenges J Natl Cancer Inst 24 1031-1036
[34]  
Chen HH(2006)Prospective study of wide excision alone for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast J Clin Oncol 186 337-343
[35]  
Duffy SW(2003)The University of Southern California/Van Nuys prognostic index for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast Am J Surg 81 48-51
[36]  
Collins LC(2015)Predictors of recurrence in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ Am Surg 5 250-253
[37]  
Achacoso N(2003)The diagnosis and management of pre-invasive breast disease: radiological diagnosis Breast Cancer Res 102 627-637
[38]  
Haque R(2010)Biomarker expression and risk of subsequent tumors after initial ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis J Natl Cancer Inst 39 622-630
[39]  
Nekhlyudov L(2003)Biological markers that predict clinical recurrence in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast Eur J Cancer 30 243-247
[40]  
Fletcher SW(2004)High nuclear grade and negative estrogen receptor are significant risk factors for recurrence in DCIS Eur J Surg Oncol 28 1684-1691