The effects of substrate and sediment burial on survival of developing pallid sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus albus) and shovelnose sturgeon (S. platorynchus) embryos

被引:0
作者
Kimberly A. Chojnacki
Amy E. George
Aaron J. DeLonay
机构
[1] U.S. Geological Survey,
[2] Columbia Environmental Research Center,undefined
来源
Environmental Biology of Fishes | 2023年 / 106卷
关键词
Pallid sturgeon; Scaphirhynchus albus; Endangered species; Shovelnose sturgeon; Scaphirhynchus platorynchus; Embryo incubation; Hatch; Substrate; Sediment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The shovelnose sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus platorynchus) and endangered pallid sturgeon (S. albus) deposit demersal and adhesive eggs in swift currents, near or over coarse substrate. Hydrographic surveys have demonstrated the dynamic nature of spawning habitats and that coarse substrates may episodically be buried (partially or completely) by fine sediments. To evaluate embryo survival of both species in various substrate conditions, laboratory trials were conducted with substrates of clean glass, gravel, medium-coarse sand (MCS), and fine sand-silt (FSS). Embryos in MCS and FSS were tested three ways: unburied, partially buried, and fully buried (1–2-mm depth). Embryos were exposed to trial conditions for 10 days from the day of fertilization (5 days beyond expected hatching). For both species, mean hatch of normally developed free embryos was highest in unburied treatments where embryos were incubated on substrates and not covered with sediments and ranged from 81.0 to 87.1% for shovelnose sturgeon and 55.2–80.0% for pallid sturgeon. Mean hatch of normal free embryos was lowest where incubating embryos were fully buried by MCS or FSS and ranged from 2.4 to 11.6% for shovelnose sturgeon and 4.8–15.2% for pallid sturgeon. We observed free embryos with physical abnormalities in all treatments; however, the occurrence was most variable in treatments fully and partially buried by MCS. Hatch of both species was also delayed in treatments where embryos were incubated fully and partially buried by MCS. Our results may be useful to estimate the relative suitability of spawning substrates in relevant river reaches.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 539
页数:12
相关论文
共 98 条
  • [1] Bailey RM(1954)River sturgeons of the American genus Acad of Sci Arts Lett 39 169-207
  • [2] Cross FB(2017): Characters, distribution and synonymy Pap. of the Mich Can J Fish Aquat Sci 10 355-392
  • [3] Baril A-M(2001)Lake Sturgeon ( Rev Fish Biol Fish 31 821-829
  • [4] Buszkiewicz JT(2015)) spawning habitat: a quantitative review J of Appl Ichthyol 130 1006-1025
  • [5] Biron PM(2001)Biology and conservation of sturgeon and paddlefish T Am Fish Soc 18 570-579
  • [6] Phelps QE(2002)Age estimations of wild pallid sturgeon ( J of Appl Ichthyol 23 411-419
  • [7] Grant JWA(2007), Forbes & Richardson 1905) based on pectoral fin spines, otoliths and bomb radiocarbon: Inferences on recruitment in the dam-fragmented Missouri River J of Appl Ichthyol 72 184-187
  • [8] Billard R(2010)Habitat use and movements of pallid and shovelnose sturgeon in the Yellowstone and Missouri Rivers in Montana and North Dakota N Am J Aquac 14 51-59
  • [9] Lecointre G(1985)Spawning behavior of lake sturgeon ( Environ Biol Fish 27 257-262
  • [10] Braaten PJ(2011)) J of Appl Ichthyol 15 157-163