Aberrant individuals’ effects on fit indices both of confirmatory factor analysis and polytomous IRT models

被引:0
作者
Asiye Şengül Avşar
机构
[1] Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University,Faculty of Education
来源
Current Psychology | 2023年 / 42卷
关键词
Person-fit statistics; Aberrant individuals; Confirmatory factor analysis; Mokken homogeneity model; Graded response model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Validity and reliability are important psychometric properties for specialists who try to understand human behavior with measurement tools. There are many factors that affect psychometric properties, and one of them is aberrant response behavior. Person-fit statistics are one way to detect aberrant individuals. The general purpose of the study was to specify the effects of possible aberrant individuals on fit indices in the Confirmatory Factor Analysis and their effects on estimated parameters by using the Mokken Homogeneity Model and the Graded Response Model. Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) and the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) were used in accordance with the purpose of this research. Flagged individuals were determined according to parametric and non-parametric person-fit statistics for both SWLS and PANAS. These individuals were removed from the data sets, and the trimmed data sets were created. Trimmed and untrimmed data sets were compared. It is seen that individuals who were flagged as aberrant generally affected the statistical results. Especially from the data sets trimmed by the parametric person-fit statistic more discriminative items were obtained. According to the research results, searching for aberrant responses can be suggested in scale development and scale adaptation studies.
引用
收藏
页码:2157 / 2166
页数:9
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
Chalmers P(2012)Mirt: A multidimensional item response theory package for the r environment Journal of Statistical Software 48 1-29
[2]  
Conijn JM(2014)Statistic lz-based person-fit methods for noncognitive multiscale measures Applied Psychological Measurement 38 122-136
[3]  
Emons WH(2015)Detecting and explaining aberrant responding to the outcome Questionnaire-45 Assessment 22 513-524
[4]  
Sijtsma K(2004)Person misfit in attitude surveys: Influences, impacts and implications International Education Journal 5 125-143
[5]  
Conijn JM(2002)Comparison of four irt models when analyzing two tests for inductive reasoning Applied Psychological Measurement 26 302-320
[6]  
Emons WH(1985)The satisfaction with life scale Journal of Personality Assessment 49 71-75
[7]  
De Jong K(2005)Using confirmatory factor analysis for construct validation: An empirical review Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 23 225-241
[8]  
Sijtsma K(2008)Nonparametric person-fit analysis of polytomous item scores Applied Psychological Measurement 32 224-247
[9]  
Curtis DD(2012)Assessing inconsistent responding in e and n measures: An application of person-fit analysis in personality Personality and Individual Differences 52 718-722
[10]  
De Koning E(2001)Detecting dissimulation in personality test scores: A comparison between person-fit indices and detection scales Educational and Psychological Measurement 61 997-1012