Comparison of different treatment strategies in the management of endogenic caesarean scar pregnancy: a multicentre retrospective study

被引:0
作者
Wenjie Qu
Hua Li
Teng Zhang
Yuan Zhang
Yanli Ban
Ningfeng Li
Jingyan Jiang
Juan Xie
Wentian Shi
Yiping Hao
Ruowen Li
Wei Liu
Baoxia Cui
机构
[1] Qilu Hospital of Shandong University,Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
[2] Taian Central Hospital,Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
[3] Shandong University,Cheeloo College of Medicine
[4] Jinan Central Hospital,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
[5] Liaocheng People’s Hospital,Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department
来源
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | / 22卷
关键词
Caesarean scar pregnancy; Endogenic; Methotrexate; Curettage; Hysteroscopy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 111 条
  • [1] Morlando M(2020)Reproductive outcome after cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 99 1278-1289
  • [2] Buca D(2018)Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: current management strategies Obstet Gynecol Surv 73 293-302
  • [3] Timor-Tritsch I(2018)Outcome of cesarean scar pregnancy managed expectantly: systematic review and meta-analysis Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 51 169-175
  • [4] Cali G(2000)Pregnancy in a cesarean scar Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 16 592-593
  • [5] Palacios-Jaraquemada J(2018)Management of Caesarean scar pregnancy with or without methotrexate before curettage: human chorionic gonadotropin trends and patient outcomes BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 18 289-738
  • [6] Monteagudo A(2017)Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review J Minim Invasive Gynecol 24 731-758
  • [7] Khalil A(2015)Local methotrexate injection as the first-line treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy: review of the literature J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22 753-967
  • [8] Cennamo C(2016)Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studies Fertil Steril 105 958-27
  • [9] La Manna V(2016)Non-tubal ectopic pregnancy Arch Gynecol Obstet 294 19-9
  • [10] Liberati M(2018)Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: a single-institution retrospective review Biomed Res Int 2018 1-76