Recommendations from the European Working Group for Value Assessment and Funding Processes in Rare Diseases (ORPH-VAL)

被引:0
作者
Lieven Annemans
Ségolène Aymé
Yann Le Cam
Karen Facey
Penilla Gunther
Elena Nicod
Michele Reni
Jean-Louis Roux
Michael Schlander
David Taylor
Carlo Tomino
Josep Torrent-Farnell
Sheela Upadhyaya
Adam Hutchings
Lugdivine Le Dez
机构
[1] Ghent University,Department of Public Health
[2] ICM,Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS)
[3] CNRS UMR 7225––Inserm U 1127––UPMC-P6 UMR S 1127,Pharmaceutical and Public Health Policy
[4] EURORDIS-Rare Diseases Europe,Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
[5] University of Edinburgh,undefined
[6] Swedish Parliament,undefined
[7] Bocconi University,undefined
[8] IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute,undefined
[9] EURORDIS-Rare Diseases Europe,undefined
[10] Health Economics at the University of Heidelberg,undefined
[11] Division of Health Economics at the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ),undefined
[12] Institute for Innovation & Valuation in Health Care,undefined
[13] University College London (UCL),undefined
[14] Clinical Research at IRCSS San Raffaele,undefined
[15] Autonomous University of Barcelona,undefined
[16] NICE,undefined
[17] Dolon Ltd,undefined
[18] European government relations and public policy at Celgene,undefined
来源
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases | / 12卷
关键词
Orphan medicinal products; Rare diseases; Pricing and reimbursement; Health technology assessment; Value assessment; Guidelines;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Rare diseases are an important public health issue with high unmet need. The introduction of the EU Regulation on orphan medicinal products (OMP) has been successful in stimulating investment in the research and development of OMPs. Despite this advancement, patients do not have universal access to these new medicines. There are many factors that affect OMP uptake, but one of the most important is the difficulty of making pricing and reimbursement (P&R) decisions in rare diseases. Until now, there has been little consensus on the most appropriate assessment criteria, perspective or appraisal process. This paper proposes nine principles to help improve the consistency of OMP P&R assessment in Europe and ensure that value assessment, pricing and funding processes reflect the specificities of rare diseases and contribute to both the sustainability of healthcare systems and the sustainability of innovation in this field. These recommendations are the output of the European Working Group for Value Assessment and Funding Processes in Rare Diseases (ORPH-VAL), a collaboration between rare disease experts, patient representatives, academics, health technology assessment (HTA) practitioners, politicians and industry representatives. ORPH-VAL reached its recommendations through careful consideration of existing OMP P&R literature and through a wide consultation with expert stakeholders, including payers, regulators and patients. The principles cover four areas: OMP decision criteria, OMP decision process, OMP sustainable funding systems and European co-ordination. This paper also presents a guide to the core elements of value relevant to OMPs that should be consistently considered in all OMP appraisals. The principles outlined in this paper may be helpful in drawing together an emerging consensus on this topic and identifying areas where consistency in payer approach could be achievable and beneficial. All stakeholders have an obligation to work together to ensure that the promise of OMP’s is realised.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 184 条
  • [1] Dupont A(2011)Access to orphan drugs despite poor quality of clinical evidence Br J Clin Pharmacol 71 488-496
  • [2] Van Wilder P(2015)Principles for consistent value assessment and sustainable funding of orphan drugs in Europe Orphanet J Rare Dis 10 53-17
  • [3] Gutierrez L(2015)Access to Orphan Drugs: A Comprehensive Review of Legislations, Regulations and Policies in 35 Countries PLoS One 10 e0140002-6
  • [4] Patris J(2013)Reconciling uncertainty of costs and outcomes with the need for access to orphan medicinal products: a comparative study of managed entry agreements across seven European countries Orphanet J Rare Dis 8 198-3
  • [5] Hutchings A(2010)HTA of orphan drugs across six countries: fair, flawed or failing? Euro Observer 12 14-340
  • [6] Cowell W(2011)Characteristics of Clinical Trials to Support Approval of Orphan vs Nonorphan Drugs for Cancer JAMA 305 2320-97
  • [7] Gammie T(2013)Cost-effectiveness assessment of orphan drugs: a scientific and political conundrum Appl Health Econ Health Policy 11 1-269
  • [8] Lu C(2014)Orphan drugs policies: a suitable case for treatment Eur J Health Econ 15 335-301
  • [9] Babar ZD(2011)Estimating the budget impact of orphan medicines in Europe: 2010–2020 Orphanet J Rare Dis 6 62-489
  • [10] Morel T(2013)Sustainable rare diseases business and drug access: no time for misconceptions Orphanet J Rare Dis 8 109-1573