Motivation in sport and exercise: a comparison between the BRSQ and BREQ

被引：0
作者：
Rodrigues F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Macedo R. [4 ]
Teixeira D. [5 ,6 ]
Cid L. [3 ]
Monteiro D. [1 ,3 ]
机构：
[1] Sport Science School of Rio Maior (ESDRM-IPSantarém), Av. Dr. Mário Soares nº110, Rio Maior
[2] Life Quality Research Center (CIEQV), Santarém
[3] Research Center in Sport, Health and Human Development (CIDESD), Vila Real
[4] Center for Organizational and Social Studies of P. PORTO, (CEOS.PP P. PORTO), Porto
[5] Lusófona University of Humanities and Technology (ULHT), Lisbon
[6] Interdisciplinary Center for the Study of Human Performance (CIPER), Lisbon
来源：
Quality & Quantity | 2020年 / 54卷 / 4期
关键词：
Exercise; Physical activity; Self-determined motivation; Sport;
D O I：
10.1007/s11135-020-00988-6
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
This study aimed to test whether the Behavioral Regulation in Sport Questionnaire and the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire can measure the same constructs in an equivalent manner. Advanced statistical procedures were used to examine if these scales could be interchangeably applied to the sport and the exercise context. In total, 2256 individuals (athletes = 1099; exercisers = 1157) completed translated and validated questionnaires measuring all types of motivation based on Self-Determination Theory. Several measurement models were tested, such as confirmatory factor models, exploratory structural equation models, and bifactor specifications. The exploratory structural equation modelling approach provided the best fit to the data in both groups. Multigroup analysis was performed within samples and between athletes and exercisers. Measurement model invariance was confirmed between samples from the same context; however, it did not achieve equivalence between scales. We hope this examination of context invariance analysis using specific validated scales can further help advance conceptual understanding of the measurement in sport and exercise. © 2020, Springer Nature B.V.
引用
收藏
页码：1335 / 1350
页数：15
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Bartholomew K., Ntoumanis N., Ryan R., Thogersen-Ntoumani C., Psychological need thwarting in the sport context: assessing the darker side of athletic experience, J. Sport Exerc. Psychol., 1, pp. 75-102, (2011)
  • [2] Bloom G., Falcao W., Caron J., Coaching high performance athletes: implications for coach training, Positive Human Functioning from a Multidimensional Perspective, (2014)
  • [3] Browne M.W., An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis, Multivariate Behav. Res., 36, 1, pp. 111-150, (2001)
  • [4] Byrne B., Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus—Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, (2011)
  • [5] Cece V., Lienhart N., Nicaise V., Guillet-Descas E., Martinent G., Longitudinal sport motivation among young athletes in intensive training settings: using methodological advances to explore temporal structure of youth behavioral regulation in sport questionnaire scores, J. Sport Exerc. Psychol., 41, 1, pp. 24-35, (2019)
  • [6] Chen F., Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance, Struct. Equ. Model. A Multidiscip. J., 14, 3, pp. 464-504, (2007)
  • [7] Chen F., What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research, J. Person. Soc. Psychol., 95, 5, pp. 1005-1018, (2008)
  • [8] Cheung G., Rensvold R., Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for testing measurement invariance, Struct. Equ. Model. A Multidiscip. J., 9, 2, pp. 233-255, (2002)
  • [9] Cid L., Monteiro D., Teixeira D., Teques P., Alves S., Moutao J., Palmeira A., The behavioral regulation in exercise questionnaire (BREQ-3) Portuguese-version: evidence of reliability, validity and invariance across gender, Front Psychol., 9, (2018)
  • [10] Clancy R., Herring M., Campbell M., Motivation measures in sport: a critical review and bibliometric analysis, Front Psychol., 8, (2017)
123456