Photoelectric factor prediction using automated learning and uncertainty quantification

被引:0
作者
Khalid Alsamadony
Ahmed Farid Ibrahim
Salaheldin Elkatatny
Abdulazeez Abdulraheem
机构
[1] King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals,Department of Petroleum Engineering
[2] King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals,Center for Integrative Petroleum Research
来源
Neural Computing and Applications | 2023年 / 35卷
关键词
Machine learning algorithms; Well logging; Photoelectric factor; Automated learning; Uncertainty quantification; Gaussian process regression; Fuzzy logic; Artificial neural network (ANN);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The photoelectric factor (PEF) is an important well-logging tool to distinguish between different types of reservoir rocks because PEF measurement is sensitive to elements with high atomic numbers. Furthermore, the ratio of rock minerals could be determined by combining PEF log with other well logs. However, PEF logs could be missing in some cases such as in old well logs and wells drilled with barite-based mud. Therefore, developing models for estimating missing PEF logs is essential in those circumstances. In this work, we developed various machine learning models to predict PEF values using the following well logs as inputs: bulk density (RHOB), neutron porosity (NPHI), gamma ray (GR), compressional and shear velocity. The predictions of PEF values using adaptive-network-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and artificial neural network (ANN) models have errors of about 16% and 14% average absolute percentage error (AAPE) in the testing dataset, respectively. Thus, a different approach was proposed that is based on the concept of automated machine learning. It works by automatically searching for the optimal model type and optimizes its hyperparameters for the dataset under investigation. This approach selected a Gaussian process regression (GPR) model for the accurate estimation of PEF values. The developed GPR model decreases the AAPE of the predicted PEF values in the testing dataset to about 10% AAPE. This error could be further decreased to about 2% by modeling the potential noise in the measurements using the GPR model.
引用
收藏
页码:22595 / 22604
页数:9
相关论文
共 88 条
  • [1] Asoodeh M(2015)The prediction of photoelectric factor, formation true resistivity, and formation water saturation from petrophysical Well log data: a committee neural network approach Energy Sour Part A: Recover Utilization Environ Eff 37 557-566
  • [2] Shadizadeh SR(2021)A Comparison of machine learning algorithms in predicting lithofacies: case studies from Norway and Kazakhstan Energies (Basel) 14 1896-406
  • [3] Merembayev T(2020)Machine learning in electrofacies classification and subsurface lithology interpretation: a rough set theory approach Appl Sci 10 5940-321
  • [4] Kurmangaliyev D(2020)Log data-driven model and feature ranking for water saturation prediction using machine learning approach J Pet Sci Eng 194 107291-685
  • [5] Bekbauov B(2021)Prediction of water saturation from well log data by machine learning algorithms: boosting and super learner J Mar Sci Eng 9 666-8054
  • [6] Amanbek Y(2021)Generating pseudo well logs for a part of the upper Bakken using recurrent neural networks J Pet Sci Eng 200 108253-27442
  • [7] Hossain TM(2021)Synthetic sonic log generation with machine learning: a contest summary from five methods Petrophysics SPWLA J Formation Eval Reserv Descr 62 393-18792
  • [8] Watada J(2013)Fast fuzzy modeling method to estimate missing logsin hydrocarbon reservoirs J Pet Sci Eng 112 310-1447
  • [9] Aziz IA(2021)Synthetic geochemical well logs generation using ensemble machine learning techniques for the Brazilian pre-salt reservoirs J Pet Sci Eng 196 108080-219
  • [10] Hermana M(2022)Evaluation of different machine learning frameworks to predict CNL-FDC-PEF logs via hyperparameters optimization and feature selection J Pet Sci Eng 208 109463-278