Individual reading styles: a narrative approach to understanding reading behaviour

被引:0
作者
John Milne
机构
[1] School of Education, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland
来源
SN Social Sciences | / 1卷 / 2期
关键词
Metacognition; Narrative; Reading comprehension; Reading strategy; Reading style;
D O I
10.1007/s43545-020-00054-w
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article reports on the findings from a study that intended to consider the validity of a model of reading comprehension. In the process of coding the resulting verbal protocols, the ‘feel’ or experience of the actual readers was lost, as was the individuality of the participants. Narratives were then developed to describe the experience of the reading and to recapture that individual nature of each reader’s approach to making sense of the texts they read. After those narratives were developed, some patterns emerged that are discussed in this article as reading styles. Some of these styles resulted in the reader developing a good understanding of what they were reading and others did not. The successful styles were classified in two ways, by the main strategy used and by the deliberateness of the readers’ construction of understanding. There are two pairs of successful reading styles discussed here, making four successful styles in total. Readers using a visualisation strategy are described as either “movie makers” for those who consciously constructed their mental movies, and as “Movie watchers” for those who experienced the process as being more receptive. The other strategy used in successful reading was questioning, either as an active “Hunter-seeker” approach or in the less-active “Wondering” style. Three styles that were not associated with successful reading are also described. Some implications for future research, and for teaching and learning are also discussed. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG part of Springer Nature 2021.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Afflerbach P., The influence of prior knowledge and text genre on readers' prediction strategies, Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, pp. 131-148, (1990)
  • [2] Baker L., Metacognition in comprehension instruction, Comprehension instruction: research-based best practices, pp. 77-95, (2002)
  • [3] Block C.C., Pressley M., Comprehension instruction: research-based best practices, (2001)
  • [4] Conley M., Improving adolescent comprehension: developing comprehension strategies in the content areas, Handbook of research on reading comprehension, pp. 406-427, (2016)
  • [5] Creswell J.W., Qualitative inquiry and research design, (2007)
  • [6] Darr C., McDowall S., Ferral H., Twist J., Watson V., Progressive achievement test: reading, (2008)
  • [7] Davis A.J., Teaching reading comprehension, (2016)
  • [8] Duke N.K., Pearson P.D., Effective practices for developing reading comprehension, What research has to say about reading instruction, pp. 205-242, (2002)
  • [9] Elley W., Croft C., Assessing the difficulty of reading materials: the noun frequency method, (1989)
  • [10] Ericsson K.A., Simon H.A., Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data, (1993)