Does robot-assisted gait training improve mobility, activities of daily living and quality of life in stroke? A single-blinded, randomized controlled trial

被引:0
作者
Rustem Mustafaoglu
Belgin Erhan
Ipek Yeldan
Berrin Gunduz
Ela Tarakci
机构
[1] Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa,Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Division of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences
[2] Istanbul Medeniyet University,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine
[3] Istanbul Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training Hospital,undefined
来源
Acta Neurologica Belgica | 2020年 / 120卷
关键词
Stroke; Activities of daily living; Quality of life; Robotics; Rehabilitation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) on mobility, activities of daily living (ADLs), and quality of life (QoL) in stroke rehabilitation. Fifty-one stroke patients randomly assigned to Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3 received conventional training (CT) plus RAGT, CT, and RAGT, respectively. The training duration was for 6 weeks. The primary outcome measures were the Barthel Index (BI), Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL), 6-Minute Walk Test (6-MWT), and Stair Climbing Test (SCT). The secondary outcomes were Fugl Meyer Assessment-Lower Extremity (FMA-LE), Comfortable 10-m Walk Test (CWT), Fast 10-m Walk Test (FWT), and Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE). The mean change in all the primary [BI (p = 0.001), 6-MWT (p = 0.001), SS-QOL (p < 0.0001), and SCT (p = 0.004)] and except the FWT (p = 0.354) all the other secondary outcomes [FMA-LE (p = 0.049), CWT (p = 0.025) and RPE (p = 0.023)] improved significantly between the three groups. In the subgroup analysis, BI, 6-MWT, SS-QOL, and SCT improved significantly in Group 1 compared to Group 2 and Group 3 (p < 0.016). However, FMA-LE, CWT, and the RPE significantly improved in Group 1 compared to Group 2 and, also, only CWT improved significantly in Group 1 compared to Group 3 (p = 0.011). In a subgroup analysis of the primary and secondary outcome measures, there were no significant differences in Group 2 compared to Group 3 (p > 0.05). While combined training leads to more improvement in mobility, ADLs, and QoL, CT showed a similar improvement compared to the RAGT in stroke patients.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 344
页数:9
相关论文
共 175 条
  • [1] Belda-Lois JM(2011)Rehabilitation of gait after stroke: a review towards a top-down approach J Neuroeng Rehabil 8 66-836
  • [2] Mena-del Horno S(1987)Disability and use of rehabilitation services following stroke in Rochester, Minnesota, 1975–1979 Stroke 18 830-72
  • [3] Bermejo-Bosch I(2004)Motor rehabilitation and brain plasticity after hemiparetic stroke Prog Neurobiol 73 61-1269
  • [4] Moreno JC(2015)Robotic-assisted gait training in neurological patients: who may benefit? Ann Biomed Eng 43 1260-514
  • [5] Pons JL(2016)Robotic gait rehabilitation and substitution devices in neurological disorders: where are we now? Neurol Sci 37 503-111
  • [6] Farina D(2015)The effect of body weight support treadmill training on gait recovery, proximal lower limb motor pattern, and balance in patients with subacute stroke Biomed Res Int 2015 175719-653
  • [7] Iosa M(2017)Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke: a major update of the evidence Stroke 10 CD006185-1919
  • [8] Molinari M(2019)Robotic-assisted gait training effect on function and gait speed in subacute and chronic stroke population: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Eur Neurol 81 103-13
  • [9] Tamburella F(2013)Dual effects of body-weight supported treadmill training on cardiovascular fitness and walking ability early after stroke: a randomized controlled trial Neurorehabil Neural Repair 27 644-1702
  • [10] Ramos A(2010)Balance, balance confidence, and health-related quality of life in persons with chronic stroke after body weight–supported treadmill training Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91 1914-135