Understanding missed opportunities for more timely diagnosis of cancer in symptomatic patients after presentation

被引:0
作者
G Lyratzopoulos
P Vedsted
H Singh
机构
[1] Health Behaviour Research Centre,Department of Epidemiology and Public Health
[2] University College London,Department of Public Health and Primary Care
[3] Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research,Department of Public Health
[4] University of Cambridge,Department of Medicine
[5] Institute of Public Health,undefined
[6] Research Unit for General Practice,undefined
[7] Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care (CaP),undefined
[8] Aarhus University,undefined
[9] DK-Bartholins Allé,undefined
[10] 8000 Aarhus,undefined
[11] Denmark,undefined
[12] Houston Veterans Affairs Center for Innovations in Quality,undefined
[13] Effectiveness and Safety,undefined
[14] Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the Section of Health Services Research,undefined
[15] Baylor College of Medicine,undefined
来源
British Journal of Cancer | 2015年 / 112卷
关键词
neoplasm; diagnosis; missed opportunities; patient safety; general practice; system factors; errors; quality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The diagnosis of cancer is a complex, multi-step process. In this paper, we highlight factors involved in missed opportunities to diagnose cancer more promptly in symptomatic patients and discuss responsible mechanisms and potential strategies to shorten intervals from presentation to diagnosis. Missed opportunities are instances in which post-hoc judgement indicates that alternative decisions or actions could have led to more timely diagnosis. They can occur in any of the three phases of the diagnostic process (initial diagnostic assessment; diagnostic test performance and interpretation; and diagnostic follow-up and coordination) and can involve patient, doctor/care team, and health-care system factors, often in combination. In this perspective article, we consider epidemiological ‘signals’ suggestive of missed opportunities and draw on evidence from retrospective case reviews of cancer patient cohorts to summarise factors that contribute to missed opportunities. Multi-disciplinary research targeting such factors is important to shorten diagnostic intervals post presentation. Insights from the fields of organisational and cognitive psychology, human factors science and informatics can be extremely valuable in this emerging research agenda. We provide a conceptual foundation for the development of future interventions to minimise the occurrence of missed opportunities in cancer diagnosis, enriching current approaches that chiefly focus on clinical decision support or on widening access to investigations.
引用
收藏
页码:S84 / S91
相关论文
共 325 条
[21]  
Norbury M(2012)Cognitive interventions to reduce diagnostic error: a narrative review BMJ Qual Saf 21 535-e36
[22]  
Watt G(2014)Implementing direct access to low-dose computed tomography in general practice-method, adaption and outcome PLoS One 9 e112162-ii5
[23]  
Wyke S(2014)Quality deviations in cancer diagnosis: prevalence and time to diagnosis in general practice Br J Gen Pract 64 e92-i65
[24]  
Guthrie B(2014)Opportunities to diagnose chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in routine care in the UK: a retrospective study of a clinical cohort Lancet Respir Med 2 267-839
[25]  
Baughan P(2009)Alarm symptoms and identification of non-cancer diagnoses in primary care: cohort study BMJ 339 b3094-690
[26]  
O'Neill B(2007)Alarm symptoms in early diagnosis of cancer in primary care: cohort study using General Practice Research Database BMJ 334 1040-365
[27]  
Fletcher E(2011)Services for people with ankylosing spondylitis in the UK—a survey of rheumatologists and patients Rheumatology (Oxford) 50 1991-ii39
[28]  
Birt L(2009)The CAPER studies: five case-control studies aimed at identifying and quantifying the risk of cancer in symptomatic primary care patients Br J Cancer 101 S80-e597
[29]  
Hall N(2013)Evaluation of risk assessment tools for suspected cancer in general practice: a cohort study Br J Gen Pract 63 e30-280
[30]  
Emery J(2013)The pursuit of better diagnostic performance: a human factors perspective BMJ Qual Saf 22 ii1-e46