The evaluation of a scoring system in airway management after oral cancer surgery

被引:17
作者
Lee H.-J. [1 ]
Kim J.-W. [2 ]
Choi S.-Y. [2 ]
Kim C.-S. [2 ]
Kwon T.-G. [2 ]
Paeng J.-Y. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sahmyook Adventist Dental Hospital, Seoul
[2] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, 2175 Dalgubeoldae-ro, Daegu
关键词
Nasotracheal intubation; Oral cancer; Scoring system; Tracheostomy;
D O I
10.1186/s40902-015-0021-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the usefulness of tracheostomy scoring system in the decision of postoperative airway management in oral cancer patients. Materials and methods: A total of 104 patients were reviewed in this retrospective study, who underwent radical resection with or without neck dissection and free flap reconstruction due to oral cancer. The patients were classified into three groups according to the timing of the extubation; extubated groups (n = 51), overnight intubation group (n = 45), and tracheostomy group (n = 8). Cameron’s score was used to evaluate the relation between the state of the patient’s airway and the type of the operation. Results: Tracheostomy was performed in eight patients (8/104, 7.7 %). A total of 22 patients (21.2 %) had more than 5 points of which 17 patients (77.3 %) did not have a tracheostomy and any postoperative emergency airway problems. The tracheostomy scores were significantly different among the three groups. Hospital stay showed a significant correlation with the tracheostomy score. Conclusions: The scoring system did not quite agree with the airway management of the authors’ clinic; however, it can be one of the clinical factors predicting the degree of the postoperative airway obstruction and surgical aggressiveness for recovery. The further studies are needed for clinically more reliable scoring systems. © 2015, Lee et al.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Suh J.D., Sercarz J.A., Abemayor E., Calcaterra T.C., Rawnsley J.D., Alam D., Blackwell K.E., Analysis of outcome and complications in 400 cases of microvascular head and neck reconstruction, Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 130, pp. 962-966, (2004)
[2]  
Buitelaar D.R., Balm A.J.M., Antonini N., van Tinteren H., Huitink J.M., Cardiovascular and respiratory complications after major head and neck surgery, Head Neck, 28, pp. 595-602, (2006)
[3]  
Castling B., Telfer M., Avery B.S., Complications of tracheostomy in major head and neck cancer surgery
[4]  
a retrospective study of 60 consecutive cases, Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 32, pp. 3-5, (1994)
[5]  
Rao M.K., Reilley T.E., Schuller D.E., Young D.C., Analysis of risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complications in head and neck surgery, Laryngoscope, 102, pp. 45-47, (1992)
[6]  
Semenov Y.R., Starmer H.M., Gourin C.G., The effect of pneumonia on short-term outcomes and cost of care after head and neck cancer surgery, Laryngoscope, 122, pp. 1994-2004, (2012)
[7]  
Cameron M., Corner A., Diba A., Hankins M., Development of a tracheostomy scoring system to guide airway management after major head and neck surgery, Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 38, pp. 846-849, (2009)
[8]  
Marsh M., Elliott S., Anand R., Brennan P.A., Early postoperative care for free flap head & neck reconstructive surgery - a national survey of practice, Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 47, pp. 182-185, (2009)
[9]  
Waldron J., Padgham N.D., Hurley S.E., Complications of emergency and elective tracheostomy: a retrospective study of 150 consecutive cases, Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 72, pp. 218-220, (1990)
[10]  
Durbin C.G., Tracheostomy: why, when, and how?, Respir Care, 55, pp. 1056-1068, (2010)