Real-world assessment of afatinib for patients with EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer

被引:0
作者
Satoshi Igawa
Taihei Ono
Masashi Kasajima
Seiichiro Kusuhara
Sakiko Otani
Tomoya Fukui
Masanori Yokoba
Masaru Kubota
Masato Katagiri
Hisashi Mitsufuji
Jiichiro Sasaki
Katsuhiko Naoki
机构
[1] Kitasato University School of Medicine,Department of Respiratory Medicine
[2] Kitasato University,School of Allied Health Sciences
[3] Kitasato University School of Nursing,undefined
[4] Kitasato University School of Medicine,undefined
[5] Research and Development Center for New Medical Frontiers,undefined
[6] Kitasato University School of Medicine,undefined
来源
Investigational New Drugs | 2020年 / 38卷
关键词
Non-small cell lung cancer; Real-world; Afatinib; Predictive factor;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Afatinib is used to treat patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring common EGFR mutations; however, the clinicopathological factors that predict this drug’s effectiveness in real-world settings remain unclear. We therefore evaluated the effectiveness of afatinib in such patients and assessed potential prognostic factors. Methods We retrospectively investigated patients with NSCLC who received first-line afatinib between July 2014 and August 2018. Variables (including sex, age, performance status, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, EGFR genotype, smoking status, clinical stage prior to treatment [stage IV vs.. postoperative recurrence], presence or absence of brain metastases, body surface area, any afatinib dose reductions, and afatinib starting dose [40 vs.. 20 or 30 mg]) were subjected to a Cox proportional hazards regression model to estimate progression-free survival (PFS). Results Forty-eight patients with a median age of 67 years were included; the objective response rate was 62.5% (30 patients). The median PFS was 14.1 months; the PFS periods were 11.8 and 15.9 months for patients receiving 40 mg versus 20–30 mg of afatinib (P = 0.41), respectively, and were 14.5 and 13.8 months for patients who required afatinib dose reduction and those who did not, respectively (P = 0.80). The PFS tended to be longer in patients without brain metastases (albeit not significantly). Ultimately, no significant predictive values for PFS were identified. Conclusions Afatinib is effective for patients with NSCLC harboring common EGFR mutations irrespective of their clinicopathological backgrounds. A direct comparison of afatinib and osimertinib in treatment-naïve patients is warranted to determine the optimal standard of care.
引用
收藏
页码:1906 / 1914
页数:8
相关论文
共 116 条
  • [1] Fitzmaurice C(2017)Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study JAMA Oncol 3 524-548
  • [2] Allen C(2012)Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012 CA Cancer J Clin 62 220-241
  • [3] Siegel R(2011)Outcome of advanced NSCLC patients harboring sensitizing Ann Oncol 22 2277-2285
  • [4] DeSantis C(2012) mutations randomized to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors or chemotherapy as first-line treatment: a meta-analysis Clin Lung Cancer 13 107-114
  • [5] Virgo K(2004)Efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with Science 304 1497-1500
  • [6] Bria E(2017)-mutated non–small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of 13 randomized trials Mol Clin Oncol 6 409-414
  • [7] Milella M(2020) mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy N Engl J Med 382 41-50
  • [8] Cuppone F(2016)Erlotinib as second- or third-line treatment in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Keio Lung Oncology Group Study 001 (KLOG001) Onco Targets Ther 9 3711-3726
  • [9] Petrelli F(2015)Overall survival with osimertinib in untreated, Oncology 89 275-280
  • [10] Borgonovo K(2018)-mutated advanced NSCLC Oncology 95 109-115