Recommendations on robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a Brazilian experts’ consensus

被引:0
|
作者
Eliney Ferreira Faria
Carlos Vaz Melo Maciel
André Berger
Anuar Mitre
Breno Dauster
Celso Heitor Freitas
Clovis Fraga
Daher Chade
Marcos Dall’Oglio
Francisco Carvalho
Franz Campos
Gustavo Franco Carvalhal
Gustavo Caserta Lemos
Gustavo Guimarães
Hamilton Zampolli
Joao Ricardo Alves
Joao Pádua Manzano
Marco Antônio Fortes
Marcos Flavio Holanda Rocha
Mauricio Rubinstein
Murilo Luz
Pedro Romanelli
Rafael Coelho
Raphael Rocha
Roberto Dias Machado
Rodolfo Borges dos Reis
Stenio Zequi
Romulo Guida
Valdair Muglia
Marcos Tobias-Machado
机构
[1] Hospital Felicio Rocho,
[2] Hospital Moinhos de Vento,undefined
[3] University of São Paulo,undefined
[4] Hospital Aristides Maltez,undefined
[5] Hospital Benefiencia Portuguesa,undefined
[6] Hospital Real Portugues,undefined
[7] Instituto Cancer de São Paulo,undefined
[8] Hospital Porto Dias,undefined
[9] Instituto Nacional do Cancer,undefined
[10] Hospital Albert Einstein,undefined
[11] Hospital Benefiencia Portuguesa,undefined
[12] Instituto do Cancer,undefined
[13] Hospital de Base de Brasilia,undefined
[14] Hospital Moriah,undefined
[15] Instituto Dor,undefined
[16] Hospital Monte Klinikun,undefined
[17] University of Rio de Janeiro,undefined
[18] Hospital Felício Rocho,undefined
[19] Hospital Americas,undefined
[20] Hospital de Cancer de Barretos,undefined
[21] University of São Paulo,undefined
[22] AC Camargo,undefined
[23] Hospital Quinta Dor,undefined
[24] Faculdade de Medcina ABC,undefined
来源
Journal of Robotic Surgery | 2021年 / 15卷
关键词
Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy; Prostate cancer; Experts;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Radical prostatectomy is a commonly adopted treatment for localized/locally advanced prostate cancer in men with a life expectancy of ten years or more. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is comparable to open radical prostatectomy on cancer control and complication rates; however, new evidence suggests that RARP may have better functional outcomes, especially with respect to urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction. Some of the surgical steps of RARP are not adequately described in published literature and, as such, may have an impact on the final outcomes of the procedure. We organized a Brazilian experts’ panel to evaluate best practices in RARP. The confection of the recommendations broadly involved: selection of the experts; establishment of working groups; systematic review of the literature and elaboration of a questionnaire; and construction of the final text with the approval of all participants. The participants reviewed the publications in English from December 2019 to February 2020. A one-round Delphi technique was employed in 188 questions. Five reviewers worked on the final recommendations using consensual and non-consensual questions. We found 59.9% of questions with greater than 70% agreement that were considered consensual. Non-consensual questions were reported according to the responses. The recommendations were based on evidence-based literature and individual perceptions adapted to the Brazilian reality, although some issues remain controversial. We believe that these recommendations may help urologists involved in RARP and hope that future discussions on this surgical procedure may evolve over the ensuing years.
引用
收藏
页码:829 / 839
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy after more than 5 years
    Michele Billia
    Oussama Elhage
    Benjamin Challacombe
    Declan Cahill
    Rick Popert
    Kathy Holmes
    Roger Sinclair Kirby
    Prokar Dasgupta
    World Journal of Urology, 2014, 32 : 413 - 418
  • [22] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: The Ohio State University technique
    Vipul R. Patel
    Ketul K. Shah
    Rahul K. Thaly
    Hugh Lavery
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2007, 1 (1) : 51 - 59
  • [23] Avoiding and managing vascular injury during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Sotelo, Rene
    Nunez Bragayrac, Luciano A.
    Machuca, Victor
    Garza Cortes, Roberto
    Azhar, Raed A.
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2015, 7 (01) : 41 - 48
  • [24] Salvage Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Experience with 14 Cases
    Ou, Yen-Chuan
    Hung, Sheng-Chun
    Hwang, Li-Hua
    Yang, Chun-Kuang
    Hung, Siu-Wan
    Tung, Min-Che
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 37 (04) : 2045 - 2050
  • [25] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial outcomes of 500 cases
    Yilmaz, Kayhan
    Ayranci, Ali
    Erdi, Eren
    Ozsoy, Cagatay
    Taha-Olcucu, Mahmut
    Ekrem-Islamoglu, Mahmut
    Savas, Murat
    Ates, Mutlu
    CIRUGIA Y CIRUJANOS, 2022, 90 (06): : 770 - 774
  • [26] Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: an Australian single-surgeon series
    Papachristos, Alexander
    Basto, Marnique
    te Marvelde, Luc
    Moon, Daniel
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 85 (03) : 154 - 158
  • [27] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: The Ohio State University technique
    Patel, Vipul R.
    Shah, Ketul K.
    Thaly, Rahul K.
    Lavery, Hugh
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2007, 1 (01) : 51 - 59
  • [28] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: An objective assessment and review of the literature
    Borden, Lester S., Jr.
    Kozlowski, Paul M.
    THESCIENTIFICWORLDJOURNAL, 2006, 6 : 2589 - 2600
  • [29] Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy - the 5-year Romanian experience
    Logigan, Horia
    Andras, Julia
    Pop, Cristian-Doru
    Muresan, Marius
    Crisan, Nicolae
    Coman, Ioan
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2015, 20 (04): : 1068 - 1073
  • [30] Age-stratified continence outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Sadri, Iman
    Arezki, Adel
    Zakaria, Ahmed S.
    Couture, Felix
    Nguyen, David-Dan
    Bousmaha, Nassim
    Karakiewicz, Pierre
    Zorn, Kevin C.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 29 (05) : 11292 - 11299