Recommendations on robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a Brazilian experts’ consensus

被引:0
|
作者
Eliney Ferreira Faria
Carlos Vaz Melo Maciel
André Berger
Anuar Mitre
Breno Dauster
Celso Heitor Freitas
Clovis Fraga
Daher Chade
Marcos Dall’Oglio
Francisco Carvalho
Franz Campos
Gustavo Franco Carvalhal
Gustavo Caserta Lemos
Gustavo Guimarães
Hamilton Zampolli
Joao Ricardo Alves
Joao Pádua Manzano
Marco Antônio Fortes
Marcos Flavio Holanda Rocha
Mauricio Rubinstein
Murilo Luz
Pedro Romanelli
Rafael Coelho
Raphael Rocha
Roberto Dias Machado
Rodolfo Borges dos Reis
Stenio Zequi
Romulo Guida
Valdair Muglia
Marcos Tobias-Machado
机构
[1] Hospital Felicio Rocho,
[2] Hospital Moinhos de Vento,undefined
[3] University of São Paulo,undefined
[4] Hospital Aristides Maltez,undefined
[5] Hospital Benefiencia Portuguesa,undefined
[6] Hospital Real Portugues,undefined
[7] Instituto Cancer de São Paulo,undefined
[8] Hospital Porto Dias,undefined
[9] Instituto Nacional do Cancer,undefined
[10] Hospital Albert Einstein,undefined
[11] Hospital Benefiencia Portuguesa,undefined
[12] Instituto do Cancer,undefined
[13] Hospital de Base de Brasilia,undefined
[14] Hospital Moriah,undefined
[15] Instituto Dor,undefined
[16] Hospital Monte Klinikun,undefined
[17] University of Rio de Janeiro,undefined
[18] Hospital Felício Rocho,undefined
[19] Hospital Americas,undefined
[20] Hospital de Cancer de Barretos,undefined
[21] University of São Paulo,undefined
[22] AC Camargo,undefined
[23] Hospital Quinta Dor,undefined
[24] Faculdade de Medcina ABC,undefined
来源
Journal of Robotic Surgery | 2021年 / 15卷
关键词
Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy; Prostate cancer; Experts;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Radical prostatectomy is a commonly adopted treatment for localized/locally advanced prostate cancer in men with a life expectancy of ten years or more. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is comparable to open radical prostatectomy on cancer control and complication rates; however, new evidence suggests that RARP may have better functional outcomes, especially with respect to urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction. Some of the surgical steps of RARP are not adequately described in published literature and, as such, may have an impact on the final outcomes of the procedure. We organized a Brazilian experts’ panel to evaluate best practices in RARP. The confection of the recommendations broadly involved: selection of the experts; establishment of working groups; systematic review of the literature and elaboration of a questionnaire; and construction of the final text with the approval of all participants. The participants reviewed the publications in English from December 2019 to February 2020. A one-round Delphi technique was employed in 188 questions. Five reviewers worked on the final recommendations using consensual and non-consensual questions. We found 59.9% of questions with greater than 70% agreement that were considered consensual. Non-consensual questions were reported according to the responses. The recommendations were based on evidence-based literature and individual perceptions adapted to the Brazilian reality, although some issues remain controversial. We believe that these recommendations may help urologists involved in RARP and hope that future discussions on this surgical procedure may evolve over the ensuing years.
引用
收藏
页码:829 / 839
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Recommendations on robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a Brazilian experts' consensus
    Faria, Eliney Ferreira
    Maciel, Carlos Vaz Melo
    Berger, Andre
    Mitre, Anuar
    Dauster, Breno
    Freitas, Celso Heitor, Jr.
    Fraga, Clovis
    Chade, Daher
    Dall'Oglio, Marcos
    Carvalho, Francisco
    Campos, Franz
    Carvalhal, Gustavo Franco
    Lemos, Gustavo Caserta
    Guimaraes, Gustavo
    Zampolli, Hamilton
    Alves, Joao Ricardo
    Manzano, Joao Padua
    Fortes, Marco Antonio
    Rocha, Marcos Flavio Holanda
    Rubinstein, Mauricio
    Luz, Murilo
    Romanelli, Pedro
    Coelho, Rafael
    Rocha, Raphael
    Machado, Roberto Dias
    dos Reis, Rodolfo Borges
    Zequi, Stenio
    Guida, Romulo
    Muglia, Valdair
    Tobias-Machado, Marcos
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2021, 15 (06) : 829 - 839
  • [2] Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in 2010
    Singh, Iqbal
    Hemal, Ashok K.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2010, 10 (05) : 671 - 682
  • [3] Critical appraisal of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Brandina, Ricardo
    Berger, Andre
    Kamoi, Kazumi
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2009, 19 (03) : 290 - 296
  • [4] Technical advancements in robotic prostatectomy: single-port extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and single-port transperineal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Aminsharifi, Alireza
    Sawczyn, Guilherme
    Wilson, Clark A.
    Garisto, Juan
    Kaouk, Jihad
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (02) : 848 - 855
  • [5] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after aborted retropubic radical prostatectomy
    Kowalczyk K.J.
    Huang A.C.
    Williams S.B.
    Yu H.-Y.
    Hu J.C.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2013, 7 (3) : 301 - 304
  • [6] Predictors of costs for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Bolenz, Christian
    Gupta, Amit
    Roehrborn, Claus G.
    Lotan, Yair
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2011, 29 (03) : 325 - 329
  • [7] Review of optimal techniques for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Kasabwala, Khushabu
    Patel, Neal A.
    Hu, Jim C.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2018, 28 (02) : 102 - 107
  • [8] Clipless Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Impact on Outcomes
    Basourakos, Spyridon P.
    Zhu, Alec
    Lewicki, Patrick J.
    Ramaswamy, Ashwin
    Cheng, Emily
    Dudley, Vanessa
    Yu, Miko
    Karir, Beerinder
    Hung, Andrew J.
    Khani, Francesca
    Hu, Jim C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2022, 8 (05): : 1176 - 1185
  • [9] Abdominal Wall Haemorrhage After Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Is it a Complication of Robotic Surgery?
    Tasci, A. I.
    Simsek, A.
    Tugcu, V.
    Bitkin, A.
    Sonmezay, E.
    Torer, B. D.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2013, 37 (10): : 634 - 639
  • [10] Open versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better?
    Wilson, Timothy
    Torrey, Robert
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2011, 21 (03) : 200 - 205