Design theory: a foundation of a new paradigm for design science and engineering

被引:0
作者
Armand Hatchuel
Pascal Le Masson
Yoram Reich
Eswaran Subrahmanian
机构
[1] Chair of Design Theory and Methods for Innovation,School of Mechanical Engineering
[2] MINES ParisTech,undefined
[3] PSL Research University,undefined
[4] CGS,undefined
[5] i3 UMR CNRS 9217,undefined
[6] Carnegie Mellon University,undefined
[7] Tel-Aviv University,undefined
来源
Research in Engineering Design | 2018年 / 29卷
关键词
Generativity; Design theory; Decision theory; Knowledge structure; Social spaces;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In recent years, the works on design theory (and particularly the works of the design theory SIG of the design society) have contributed to reconstruct the science of design, comparable in its structure, foundations and impact to decision theory, optimization or game theory in their time. These works have reconstructed historical roots and the evolution of design theory, conceptualized the field at a high level of generality and uncovered theoretical foundations, in particular the logic of generativity, the “design-oriented” structures of knowledge, and the logic of design spaces. These results give the academic field of engineering design an ecology of scientific objects and models, which allows for expanding the scope of engineering education and design courses. They have contributed to a paradigm shift in the organization of R&D departments, supporting the development of new methods and processes in innovation departments, and to establishing new models for development projects. Emerging from the field of engineering design, design theory development has now a growing impact in many disciplines and academic communities. The research community may play a significant role in addressing contemporary challenges if it brings the insights and applicability of design theory to open new ways of thinking in the developing and developed world.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 21
页数:16
相关论文
共 202 条
[1]  
Agogué M(2012)Orphan Innovation, or when path-creation goes stale: missing entrepreneurs or missing innovation? Technol Anal Strateg Manag 24 603-616
[2]  
Le Masson P(2013)Rethinking the Role of Intermediaries as an architect o f collective exploration and creation for knowledge in open innovation Int J Innov Manag 17 24-12
[3]  
Robinson DKR(2014)The impact of type of examples on originality: explaining fixation and stimulation effects J Creat Behav 48 1-318
[4]  
Agogué M(2015)Resisting classical solutions: the creative mind of industrial designers and engineers J Psychol Aesthet Creat Arts 9 313-429
[5]  
Yström A(2015)Gamification of creativity: exploring the usefulness of serious games for ideation Creat Innov Manag 24 415-644
[6]  
Le Masson P(2015)Mindful deviation through combining causation and effectuation: a design theory-based study of technology entrepreneurship Creat Innov Manag 24 629-39
[7]  
Agogué M(2017)Explicating the role of innovation intermediaries in the “unknown”: a contingency approach J Strateg Manag 10 19-260
[8]  
Kazakçi A(2015)Addressing constraints creatively: how new design software helps solve the dilemma of originality and feasibility Creat Innov Manag 24 247-390
[9]  
Hatchuel A(2015)Managing radical innovation as an innovative design process: generative constraints and cumulative set of rules Creat Innov Manag 24 373-336
[10]  
Le Masson P(2012)Analyzing the design process of farming practices ensuring little bustard conservation: lessons for collective landscape management J Sustain Agric 36 319-140