Effect of estrogen priming through luteal phase and stimulation phase in poor responders in in-vitro fertilization

[1] Keay SD(1997)Assisted conception following poor ovarian response to gonadotrophin stimulation Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 104 521-27

[2] Liversedge NH(1998)Revisiting gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocols and management of poor ovarian responses to gonadotrophins Hum Reprod Update. 4 83-101

[3] Mathur RS(1999)Adjuvant L-arginine treatment for in-vitro fertilization in poor responder patients Hum Reprod. 14 1690-97

[4] Jenkins JM(2003)Clinical management of low ovarian response to stimulation for IVF: a systematic review Hum Reprod Update. 9 61-76

[5] Hugues JN(1992)The prognostic importance of the number of oocytes retrieved and estradiol levels in poor and normal responders in in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment J Assist Reprod Genet. 9 228-32

[6] Cedrin Durnerin IC(1996)High-dose human menopausal gonadotropin stimulation in poor responders does not improve in vitro fertilization outcome Fertil Steril. 65 961-65

[7] Battaglia C(2001)“Co-Flare” stimulation in the poor responder patient: predictive value of the flare response J Assist Reprod Genet. 18 629-33

[8] Salvatori M(2003)Conception rates following assisted reproduction in poor responder patients: a retrospective study in 300 consecutive cycles Reprod Biomed Online. 6 439-43

[9] Maxia N(2009)How to improve the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis Fertil Steril. 91 749-66

[10] Petraglia F(2003)Alternative approaches in the management of poor response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) Ann N Y Acad Sci 997 112-9

[1] Keay SD(1997)Assisted conception following poor ovarian response to gonadotrophin stimulation Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 104 521-27

[2] Liversedge NH(1998)Revisiting gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocols and management of poor ovarian responses to gonadotrophins Hum Reprod Update. 4 83-101

[3] Mathur RS(1999)Adjuvant L-arginine treatment for in-vitro fertilization in poor responder patients Hum Reprod. 14 1690-97

[4] Jenkins JM(2003)Clinical management of low ovarian response to stimulation for IVF: a systematic review Hum Reprod Update. 9 61-76

[5] Hugues JN(1992)The prognostic importance of the number of oocytes retrieved and estradiol levels in poor and normal responders in in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment J Assist Reprod Genet. 9 228-32

[6] Cedrin Durnerin IC(1996)High-dose human menopausal gonadotropin stimulation in poor responders does not improve in vitro fertilization outcome Fertil Steril. 65 961-65

[7] Battaglia C(2001)“Co-Flare” stimulation in the poor responder patient: predictive value of the flare response J Assist Reprod Genet. 18 629-33

[8] Salvatori M(2003)Conception rates following assisted reproduction in poor responder patients: a retrospective study in 300 consecutive cycles Reprod Biomed Online. 6 439-43

[9] Maxia N(2009)How to improve the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis Fertil Steril. 91 749-66

[10] Petraglia F(2003)Alternative approaches in the management of poor response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) Ann N Y Acad Sci 997 112-9