Just interpretation: The status of legal reasoning in the continental legal tradition

被引：0
作者：
Jemielniak J. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Law and Administrative Sciences, Leon Kozminski Academy of Entrepreneurship and Management, Warsaw
来源：
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law | 2002年 / 15卷 / 4期
关键词：
Modern Time; Legal Reasoning; Interpretation Status; Apply Linguistics; Legal Tradition;
D O I：
10.1023/A:1021247311404
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The following text discusses an issue of legal interpretation status in continental system of law. Exploring a metaphor of the interpretation as a translation, it emphasizes its creative aspect, which has been denied often in modern times. Reminding the Roman origins of contemporary continental legal systems, it uses historical arguments to accent the intrinsically inventive character of legal interpretation. © 2002 Kluwer Law International.
引用
收藏
页码：325 / 335
页数：10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Montesquieu C., The Spirit of the Laws (De Vesprit des Lois), (1748)
  • [2] McKillop B., The Judiciary in France - Reconstructing Lost Independence, Fragile Bastion: Judicial Independence in the Nineties and Beyond, (2000)
  • [3] Mounin G., Belles Infidèles, (1955)
  • [4] Berman A., Pour Une Critique des Traductions: John Donne, (1995)
  • [5] Dambska-Prokop U., Kilka uwag o tlumaczeniu tekstu, Miedzy Oryginalem a Przekladem. Czy Istnieje Teoria Przekladu?, 1, (1995)
  • [6] The Manipulation of Literature. Studies in Literary Translation, (1985)
  • [7] Banasiak B., Na tropach dekonstrukcji, Pismo Filozofii, (1993)
  • [8] The Holy Bible, (1611)
  • [9] Grodecki T., Chrzescijanskie koncepcje filozofowania w starozytnosci, Przeglad Powszechny, 1-3, 2002 PART 1, (2002)
  • [10] The Holy Bible, (1611)
123