Patients satisfaction with warfarin and willingness to switch to dabigatran: a patient survey

被引:0
作者
Hazem F. Elewa
Christina E. DeRemer
Kimble Keller
Jaspal Gujral
Thomas V. Joshua
机构
[1] Georgia Regents Health System,Pharmacy Department
[2] University of Georgia,College of Pharmacy
[3] Georgia Regents Health System,Department of Medicine
[4] Georgia Regents University,Center for Nursing Research, College of Nursing
来源
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis | 2014年 / 38卷
关键词
Warfarin; New oral anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Atrial fibrillation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Warfarin is an anticoagulant medication that is challenging to manage. Dabigatran has been approved by the FDA for stroke and systemic embolism prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation as an alternative to warfarin. Dabigatran does not require routine monitoring, has an established dose, and lacks many of the drug, herbal, and food interactions that afflict warfarin. To evaluate patients’ satisfaction with their current warfarin treatment and their opinion on switching to a newly marketed medication (dabigatran) through a brief survey. Two separate surveys were administered to (1) evaluate the patients’ opinion of their warfarin therapy and (2) evaluate their thoughts on switching to a newer anticoagulant. Responses were recorded on a rating scale of 1–5; 1 being the least and 5 being the highest. Study was conducted at the Georgia Regents Health System (GRHS) pharmacy-based anticoagulation clinic. Two hundred sixty patients on warfarin treatment were enrolled. Patients expressed high satisfaction with warfarin treatment (4.7 ± 0.78). However, a vast majority of the patients were willing to switch to an agent that: requires less frequent follow-up visits (3.9 ± 1.35); lacks interaction with food and/or beverage (4.1 ± 1.25); is as efficacious as warfarin (3.7 ± 1.38). Patients expressed that out-of-pocket cost would be a major barrier to switch to this new medication (1.3 ± 0.58). Patients are satisfied with their warfarin treatment but willing to consider a new anticoagulant. Cost was highlighted as the most significant barrier. Efficacy, dietary freedom and less frequent visits are the major factors affecting the patients’ decision.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 120
页数:5
相关论文
共 159 条
[1]  
Wolf PA(1991)Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study Stroke 22 983-988
[2]  
Abbott RD(2007)Stroke in atrial fibrillation: update on pathophysiology, new antithrombotic therapies, and evolution of procedures and devices Ann Med 39 371-391
[3]  
Kannel WB(2012)Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines Chest 141 e531S-e575S
[4]  
Savelieva I(1999)Antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis Ann Intern Med 131 492-501
[5]  
Bajpai A(2009)Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation The New Engl J Med 361 1139-1151
[6]  
Camm AJ(2012)Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of the Novel Oral Anticoagulants: do the Pivotal Clinical Trials Point to a New Paradigm? J Thromb Haemost 123 2363-2372
[7]  
You JJ(2011)Risk of bleeding with 2 doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin in older and younger patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulant therapy (RE-LY) trial Circulation 172 397-402
[8]  
Singer DE(2012)Dabigatran association with higher risk of acute coronary events: meta-analysis of noninferiority randomized controlled trials Arch Intern Med 376 975-983
[9]  
Howard PA(2010)Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin at different levels of international normalised ratio control for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the RE-LY trial Lancet 6 679-684
[10]  
Lane DA(2012)Dabigatran for anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation—early clinical experience in a hospital population and comparison to trial data Heart lung circ 10 1841-1848