The “exorbitant privilege” and “exorbitant duty” of the United States in the international monetary system: implications for developing countries

被引:0
作者
Jörg Mayer
机构
[1] United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD),
来源
Review of World Economics | 2021年 / 157卷
关键词
International financial integration; Yield differentials; Valuation effects; Currency hierarchy; F32; F33; F36; F63; E44;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The international monetary system may be viewed as a global insurance system, where the United States enjoys the “exorbitant privilege” of a positive yield differential on its external assets and liabilities during normal times, in exchange for the “exorbitant duty” of valuation losses in the form of wealth transfers to the rest of the world during crisis periods. Evidence for 76 economies and 1995–2019 indicates that some other major developed economies also enjoy an exorbitant privilege, though without suffering an exorbitant duty. By contrast, most developing economies neither have an exorbitant privilege nor benefit from wealth transfers. Developing economies as a group recorded negative return differentials and valuation losses during 2010–2019, implying a total return differential of about minus three percentage points between developing and developed economies and an annual average resource transfer from developing economies of about $800bn, or 3.3 per cent of their GDP. Econometric analysis linking crisis insurance strategies and yield differentials indicates that permanent swap arrangements, reserve holdings and regional monetary arrangements can contain negative yield differentials. Developed economies could make part of past resource transfers available to developing economies to finance recovery from the COVID-19 crisis and achieving the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
引用
收藏
页码:927 / 964
页数:37
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Aizenman J(2007)International reserves: Precautionary versus mercantilist views, theory and evidence Open Economies Review 18 191-214
[2]  
Lee J(2010)Selective swap arrangements and the global financial crisis: Analysis and interpretation International Review of Economics and Finance 19 5-18
[3]  
Aizenman J(2013)Exchange rate dynamics in a peripheral monetary economy Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 35 399-416
[4]  
Pasricha GD(2019)Accumulation of reserves in emerging and developing countries: Mercantilism versus insurance Review of World Economics 155 819-857
[5]  
Andrade RP(2010)Decomposing the US external returns differential Journal of International Economics 80 22-32
[6]  
Prates DM(2013)On returns differentials Journal of International Money and Finance 36 1-25
[7]  
Cabezas L(2017)The global financial safety net: In need of repair? National Bank of Belgium Economic Review 2017 87-112
[8]  
De Gregorio J(2018)A model of the international monetary system Quarterly Journal of Economics 133 295-355
[9]  
Curcuru SE(2017)Keynes at the periphery: Currency hierarchy and challenges for economic policy in emerging economies Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics 40 183-202
[10]  
Dvorak T(2019)The international monetary and financial system Annual Review of Economics 11 859-893