Primary Gross Tumor Volume is an Important Prognostic Factor in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Trimodality Therapy

被引:28
作者
Boggs D.H. [1 ]
Hanna A. [2 ]
Burrows W. [2 ,3 ]
Horiba N. [2 ,4 ]
Suntharalingam M. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
[2] University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
[3] Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
[4] Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
[5] Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
关键词
Esophageal cancer; Gross tumor volume; Prognostic factors; Trimodality;
D O I
10.1007/s12029-015-9699-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: This study investigated the relationship between tumor volume and outcomes in patients receiving trimodality therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Methods: Between 2001 and 2012, 67 patients treated for esophageal cancer with chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy who had available gross tumor volume (GTV) information were analyzed (35 node-negative, 32 node-positive patients with primary and nodal GTV contoured as separate regions of interest). All gross tumor volumes (GTVs) were contoured at the time of radiotherapy treatment planning. GTV optimal cutoff values were determined with receiver operating characteristic analysis and deemed significant when χ2 analysis demonstrated differences in examined prognostic variables. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: GTVprimary (P = 0.034) and N stage were significant multivariate predictors for improved local control; GTVprimary was the only multivariate predictor of PFS (P = 0.0299) and OS (P = 0.001228) at 5 years. Univariate predictors of 5-year PFS and OS included GTVprimary, node number, and metastatic lymph node ratio. GTVprimary >85 cc was the best predictor for local failure (33.3 %; 8.7 % if ≤85 cc). GTVprimary >46 cc correlated with an increased risk of 5-year distant failure (37.1 %; 6.7 % if ≤46 cc). Conclusions: GTVprimary was a significant multivariate predictor for improved local control, PFS, and OS. GTVprimary is a more powerful predictor of patient outcomes than traditional TNM staging and should be part of the decision-making process when determining optimal local and systemic options for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 137
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Posner M.C., Minsky B.D., Ilson D.H., Cancer of the esophagus, Cancer principles & practice of oncology, pp. 887-923, (2011)
[2]  
Howlader N., Noone A.M., SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2009 (Vintage 2009 populations), Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, (2012)
[3]  
Van Hagen P., Hulshof M., van Lanschot J.J.B., Et al., Preoperative chemotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer, N Engl J Med, 366, pp. 2074-2084, (2012)
[4]  
Gebski V., Burmeister B., Smithers B.M., Et al., Survival benefits from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy in oesophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis, Lancet Oncol, 8, pp. 226-234, (2007)
[5]  
Stahl M., Stuschke M., Lehmann N., Et al., Chemoradiation with and without surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, J Clin Oncol, 23, pp. 2310-2317, (2005)
[6]  
Bedenne L., Michel P., Bouche O., Et al., Chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in squamous cancer of the esophagus: FFCD 9102, J Clin Oncol, 25, pp. 1160-1168, (2007)
[7]  
Nieman D.R., Peters J.H., Treatment strategies for esophageal cancer, Gastroenterol Clin N Am, 42, pp. 187-197, (2013)
[8]  
Shapiro J., ten Kate F.J., van Hagen P., Et al., Residual esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy frequently involves the mucosa and submucosa, Ann Surg, 258, pp. 678-688, (2013)
[9]  
Compton C.C., Byrd D.R., AJCC cancer staging atlas: a companion to the seventh editions of the AJCC cancer staging manual and handbook. 7th ed. Chicago, Illinois, 2012, pp. 129-141
[10]  
Eloubeidi M.A., Desmond R., Arguedas M.R., Et al., Prognostic factors for the survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma in the U.S.: the importance of tumor length and lymph node status, Cancer, 95, pp. 1434-1443, (2002)