Sustainability Assessment of Community Forestry Practices in Nepal: Literature Review and Recommendations to Improve Community Management

被引:8
作者
Dahal D.S. [1 ,2 ]
Cao S. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Economic and Management, Beijing Forestry University, No. 35, Qing Hua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing
[2] Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 16 Lincui Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing
关键词
Community forestry; Criteria and indicators; Forest policy; Sustainability;
D O I
10.1007/s40011-015-0627-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Nepal’s Community Forestry Program is a sustainable forest management and livelihood enhancement program reformed from earlier programs of the previous century. The government’s initial policy was to provide the basic forest resources to local communities through their active participation in forest improvement and management. Nepal’s policy and development program was based on sustainability concepts. Community forestry can be sustainable and produce socially, economically, and ecologically beneficial results. A number of both qualitative and quantitative options have been applied to measure the sustainable use of forests and other natural resources in community forests, but classifying the results is challenging. Policy-makers, experts, and the communities should be involved in developing and improving criteria and indicators for community forest management, reflecting the diversity of perspectives that must be accounted for and the increasing worldwide demand for sustainability and governance. The main findings were that sustainability can be measured with numerous tools, but there are several challenges. A literature review revealed that nationally and internationally defined criteria and indicators have not been extensively applied in Nepal due to lack of technical and other expertise. © 2015, The National Academy of Sciences, India.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:10
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Food security, livelihood, and nepalese agriculture: challenges and potentials, Retrieved from, (2007)
[2]  
Stoian D., Donovan J., Poverty-environment dividends of rural community enterprises: insights from a cross-sectoral study in Latin America and the Caribbean, UNDP-UNEP Poverty and Environment Initiative “Mainstreaming poverty-environment linkages and climate change-related measures into policy in Latin America and the Caribbean, (2010)
[3]  
Shifley S.R., Aguilar F.X., Song N.F., Stewart S.I., Nowak D.J., Gormanson D.D., Moser W.K., Wormstead S., Greenfield E.J., Forests of the Northern United States. Gen Tech Rep NRS-90. Newtown Square, PA: U.S, Department of Agriculture, (2012)
[4]  
A field guide for project design and implementation: women in community forestry. FAO, Rome, (1989)
[5]  
Process H., European criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management adopted by the expert level follow-up meetings of Helsinki Conference in Geneva (24 June, 1994) and in Antalya, Turkey, (23 January, (1995)
[6]  
Criteria for measurement of sustainable tropical forest management, (1992)
[7]  
Process M., Criteria and indicators for the conservation and sustainable management of temperate and boreal forests, (1995)
[8]  
Brief introduction of Kingdom of Nepal, (2004)
[9]  
Progress towards sustainable management. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, FAO Forestry Paper, (2005)
[10]  
Nepal living standards survey. Government of Nepal, National Planning Commission Secretariat, Central Bureau of Statistics, (2011)