Time to shape up – assessment and reporting standards for data quality in clinical research using echocardiographic imaging techniques require improvement

被引:0
作者
Kai O. Hensel
机构
[1] Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust,Department of Paediatrics
[2] Addenbrooke’s Hospital,Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health
[3] Cambridge Biomedical Campus,undefined
[4] Witten/Herdecke University,undefined
[5] Center for Clinical & Translational Research (CCTR),undefined
来源
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders | / 19卷
关键词
Variability; Validity; Strain imaging; Echocardiography; Bias; Quality improvement; Clinical trials; Quality assessment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Advanced echocardiography techniques such as speckle tracking imaging are sensitive diagnostic tools frequently used in various clinical and scientific scenarios. Importantly, imperfect reproducibility and dependence of post-processing algorithms on echocardiographic image quality are potential methodological limitations. Therefore, meticulous assessment of data quality and detailed reporting of study methodology, sample specifics, technical peculiarities and measurement conditions are crucial. Unfortunately, despite the recognized importance of this, there is still no broadly accepted standard for assessing the quality of echocardiographic images in clinical research reports. This article quintessentially highlights important shortcomings of data quality assessment and methodological study design, commonly occurring in clinical research reports using advanced echocardiography techniques. Finally, suggestions are made as to how researchers, scientific communities and biomedical journals can contribute to the ever-lasting process of improving the quality of clinical research in cardiovascular imaging.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 105 条
  • [1] Huang J(2018)Left ventricular short-axis systolic function changes in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy detected by two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging BMC Cardiovasc Disord 18 13-2616
  • [2] Yan ZN(2008)Results of the predictors of response to CRT (PROSPECT) trial Circulation 117 2608-156
  • [3] Rui YF(2010)Reproducibility in echocardiographic assessment of the left ventricular global and regional function, the HUNT study Eur J Echocardiogr 11 149-453
  • [4] Fan L(2018)Speckle tracking stress echocardiography in children: interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility and the impact of echocardiographic image quality Sci Rep 8 9185-1413
  • [5] Liu C(2018)Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of M-mode and B-mode acquired mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) and its dependency on echocardiographic image quality in children PLoS One 13 446-847
  • [6] Li J(2013)The impact of foreshortening on regional strain--a comparison of regional strain evaluation between speckle tracking and tissue velocity imaging Ultraschall Med 34 1401-238
  • [7] Chung ES(2011)Echocardiographic assessment of myocardial strain J Am Coll Cardiol 58 839-1154.e1147
  • [8] Leon AR(2015)Effects of frame rate on two-dimensional speckle tracking-derived measurements of myocardial deformation in premature infants Echocardiography 32 230-600
  • [9] Tavazzi L(2014)Feasibility of left ventricular volume measurements by three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography depends on image quality and degree of left ventricular enlargement: validation study with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging J Cardiol 63 1144-1066
  • [10] Sun JP(2016)Critical Review of Current Approaches for Echocardiographic Reproducibility and Reliability Assessment in Clinical Research J Am Soc Echocardiogr 29 18-629