The missing link revisited: The role of teleology in representing legal argument

被引：28
作者：
Bench-Capon T.J.M. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool
来源：
Artificial Intelligence and Law | 2002年 / 10卷 / 1-3期
关键词：
Artificial Intelligence; Recent Work; Classic Problem; Berman; Computational Linguistic;
D O I：
10.1023/A:1019501830692
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
In this paper I recapitulate the ideas of Berman and Hafner (1993) regarding the role of teleology in legal argument. I show how these ideas can be used to address some issues arising from more recent work on legal argument, and how this relates to ideas associated with the "New Rhetoric" of Perelman. I illustrate the points with a discussion of the classic problem of which vehicles should be allowed in parks.
引用
收藏
页码：79 / 94
页数：15
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Ashley K.D., Rissland E.L., A case-based approach to modelling legal expertise, IEEE Expert, pp. 70-77, (1988)
  • [2] Ashley K.D., Modeling Legal Reasoning, (1990)
  • [3] Bench-Capon T.J.M., Some observations on modelling case based reasoning with formal argument models, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on AI and Law, pp. 36-42, (1999)
  • [4] Bench-Capon T.J.M., George C. Christie, the notion of an ideal audience in legal argument, Artificial Intelligence and Law, 9, 1, pp. 59-71, (2001)
  • [5] Berman D.H., Hafner C.D., Representing teleological structure in case-based reasoning: The missing link, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on AI and Law, pp. 50-59, (1993)
  • [6] Branting L.K., Reasoning with portions of precedent, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on AI and Law, pp. 145-154, (1991)
  • [7] Gordon T.E., The pleadings game: Formalizing procedural justice, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on AI and Law, pp. 10-19, (1993)
  • [8] Grasso F., Cawsey A., Jones R., Dialectical argumentation to solve conflicts in advice giving: A case study in the promotion of healthy nutrition, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53, pp. 1077-1115, (2000)
  • [9] Perelman Ch., Justice, Law and Argument, (1980)
  • [10] Perelman Ch., Olbrechts-Tyteca L., The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, (1969)
12