Work values and preferences for employee involvement in the management of organizations

被引:9
作者
Ghorpade J. [1 ,3 ]
Lackritz J. [2 ]
Singh G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Management, College of Business Administration, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA
[2] Department of Information and Decision Systems, College of Business Administration, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA
[3] Department of Management, College of Business Administration, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA
关键词
Employee involvement; Human resource bundles; Strategic human resource management; The lack of employee involvement; Work values;
D O I
10.1023/A:1014923119472
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study has 3 objectives: to develop a scale to measure preferences for involvement in management (PIM), to examine if PIM are related to work values (altruism, pride in craftsmanship, collectivism, and individualism), and to examine if PIM are affected by a "bundle" of work values. Data are taken from 749 participants to develop a psychometrically appealing scale for measuring PIM. Using the universalistic perspective, we predict a positive relationship between PIM and altruism, pride in craftsmanship, and collectivism, and a negative relationship between PIM and individualism. Using the synergistic perspective, we hypothesized that PIM are likely to be positively affected by a "bundle" of work values. Our results support the universalistic perspective because PIM are positively related to altruism, pride in craftsmanship, and collectivism, and negatively related to individualism. Our results did not support the synergistic perspective. In the final section of the paper, we outlined the implications of our results for organizational practice and public policy. © 2002 Plenum Publishing Corporation.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 203
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Adams R., The right to participate, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 5, pp. 91-99, (1991)
  • [2] Adams R., The role of the state in industrial relations, Research Frontiers in Industrial Relations and Human Resources, (1992)
  • [3] Adams R., Industrial Relations under Liberal Democracy: North America in Comparative Perspective, (1995)
  • [4] Bass B., Avolio B., Shatter the glass ceiling: Women may make better managers, Human Resource Management, 33, 4, pp. 549-561, (1994)
  • [5] Becker B., Gerhart B., The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: Progress and prospects, Academy of Management Journal, 39, pp. 777-778, (1996)
  • [6] Becker B.E., Huselid M.A., Pikus P.S., Spratt M.F., HR as a source of stakeholder value: Research and recommendations, Human Resource Management, 36, 1, pp. 39-47, (1997)
  • [7] Buchholz R.A., An empirical study of contemporary beliefs about work in American society, Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 2, pp. 219-227, (1978)
  • [8] Cherrington D.J., The Work Ethic, (1980)
  • [9] Cotton J.L., Employee Involvement, (1993)
  • [10] Dachler H.P., Wilpert B., Conceptual dimensions and boundaries of participation in organizations: A critical evaluation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 1, pp. 1-39, (1978)