Three Dimensions of Green Industrial Policy in the Context of Climate Change and Sustainable Development

被引:1
作者
Guendalina Anzolin
Amir Lebdioui
机构
[1] University of Urbino,
[2] University College London,undefined
[3] London School of Economics and Political Science,undefined
来源
The European Journal of Development Research | 2021年 / 33卷
关键词
Climate change; Industrial policy; Green growth; Low carbon innovation; Sustainability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Climate change has taken an increasingly important space in the development agenda. However, whether most countries can meet the challenge of mitigating climate change while simultaneously ensuring growth and poverty reduction remains debatable. This research contributes to the growing literature at the intersection of environment sustainability and economic/industrial development by identifying three dimensions of Green Industrial Policy (GIP), which rely on different approaches to mitigate climate change. Those three dimensions are (i) the consumption-centred dimension; (ii) the firm-level sustainability dimension, and (iii) the productionist innovation-driven dimension. This paper then applies this green industrial policy framework and examines the implications of pursuing different levels of GIP by drawing on a country case study (Ecuador). Two main findings arise from this study. First, a greener consumption is necessary but can hardly be achieved without industrial policies to stimulate green manufacturing and low-carbon innovation. Green industrial policy, therefore, has a central role to play in the structural transformation towards a low-carbon future. Second, a holistic and complementary approach is needed across the three dimensions of green industrial policy to ensure a coherent and developmental transition towards a low-carbon economy.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 405
页数:34
相关论文
共 135 条
[1]  
Alexander S(2012)Planned economic contraction: the emerging case for degrowth Environmental Politics 21 349-368
[2]  
Amsden A(2012)Grass roots war on poverty World Social and Economic Review. 1 114-9690
[3]  
Anadon LD(2016)Making technological innovation work for sustainable development Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 9682-2471
[4]  
Chan G(2017)Bringing production and employment back into development: Alice Amsden’s legacy for a new developmentalist agenda Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 10 1-172
[5]  
Harley AG(2018)Photovoltaics and wind status in the European Union after the Paris Agreement Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 81 2460-167
[6]  
Matus K(2017)The institutional dimension of resource efficiency in a multi-level governance system—Implications for policy mix design Energy Research & Social Science 33 163-75
[7]  
Moon S(2016)Induction stoves as an option for clean cooking in rural India Energy Policy 88 159-76
[8]  
Murthy SL(2009)The coming global climate-technology revolution Journal of Economic Perspectives 23 53-165
[9]  
Clark WC(2017)Leapfrogging to renewable energy: The opportunity for unmet electricity markets South African Journal of Industrial Engineering 126 104726-1060
[10]  
Andreoni A(2020)The politics of late late development in renewable energy sectors: Dependency and contradictory tensions in India’s National Solar Mission World Development 18 71-321