Cognitive Diagnosis for Small Educational Programs: The General Nonparametric Classification Method

被引:0
作者
Chia-Yi Chiu
Yan Sun
Yanhong Bian
机构
[1] Rutgers,
[2] The State University of New Jersey,undefined
来源
Psychometrika | 2018年 / 83卷
关键词
cognitive diagnosis; cognitive diagnostic models; general nonparametric classification method; LCDM; G-DINA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The focus of cognitive diagnosis (CD) is on evaluating an examinee’s strengths and weaknesses in terms of cognitive skills learned and skills that need study. Current methods for fitting CD models (CDMs) work well for large-scale assessments, where the data of hundreds or thousands of examinees are available. However, the development of CD-based assessment tools that can be used in small-scale test settings, say, for monitoring the instruction and learning process at the classroom level has not kept up with the rapid pace at which research and development proceeded for large-scale assessments. The main reason is that the sample sizes of the small-scale test settings are simply too small to guarantee the reliable estimation of item parameters and examinees’ proficiency class membership. In this article, a general nonparametric classification (GNPC) method that allows for assigning examinees to the correct proficiency classes with a high rate when sample sizes are at the classroom level is proposed as an extension of the nonparametric classification (NPC) method (Chiu and Douglas in J Classif 30:225–250, 2013). The proposed method remedies the shortcomings of the NPC method and can accommodate any CDM. The theoretical justification and the empirical studies are presented based on the saturated general CDMs, supporting the legitimacy of using the GNPC method with any CDM. The results from the simulation studies and real data analysis show that the GNPC method outperforms the general CDMs when samples are small.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 375
页数:20
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Chiu C-Y(2013)A nonparametric approach to cognitive diagnosis by proximity to ideal response patterns Journal of Classification 30 225-250
[2]  
Douglas JA(2009)Cluster analysis for cognitive diagnosis: Theory and applications Psychometrika 74 633-665
[3]  
Chiu C-Y(2016)Fitting the Reduced RUM with Mplus: A Tutorial International Journal of Testing 16 331-351
[4]  
Douglas JA(2011)The generalized DINA model framework Psychometrika 76 179-199
[5]  
Li X(2000)Latent class model diagnosis Biometrics 56 1055-1067
[6]  
Chiu C-Y(2009)Defining a family of cognitive diagnosis models using log-linear models with latent variables Psychometrika 74 191-210
[7]  
Köhn H-F(2001)Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric item response theory Applied Psychological Measurement 25 258-272
[8]  
Wu H-M(2017)A procedure for assessing the completeness of the Q-matrices of cognitively diagnostic tests Psychometrika 82 112-132
[9]  
de la Torre J(1977)The use of probabilistic models in the assessment of mastery Journal of Educational Statistics 2 99-120
[10]  
Garrett E(1999)Estimating multiple classification latent class models Psychometrika 64 187-212