Development and evaluation of 16 new microsatellite loci for the rock ptarmigan (Lagopus muta) and cross-species amplification for the willow grouse (L. lagopus)

被引：4

作者：

Costanzi J.-M. ^{[1
]}

Bergan F. ^{[1
]}

Sæbø M. ^{[1
]}

Jenkins A. ^{[1
]}

Steifetten Ø. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Natural Sciences and Environmental Health, University College of Southeast Norway, Gullbringvegen 36, Bøi Telemark

来源：

BMC Research Notes | / 11卷 / 1期

关键词：

Birds; Lagopus lagopus; Lagopus muta; Microsatellites; Population genetics;

D O I：

10.1186/s13104-018-3249-1

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Objective: The genetic markers designed for this study can facilitate future genetic studies on the rock ptarmigan (Lagopus muta). To our knowledge no microsatellite markers have ever been developed specifically for this species before. These new microsatellite markers will be useful for population genetics studies and for future conservation projects. Results: Using Next Generation Sequencing 6252 potential microsatellite sequences were found. Sixteen nonpalindromic tetranucleotide microsatellites and their respective primers were selected. The markers were tested on both the rock ptarmigan and the willow grouse (L. lagopus). The number of alleles varied between 2 and 18 for the rock ptarmigan, and between 3 and 13 for the willow grouse. Expected heterozygosity was in the range 0.1244-0.8692 and 0.1358-0.8722 for the rock ptarmigan and the willow grouse, respectively. © 2018 The Author(s).

引用

共 24 条

[1]

Henriksen S., Hilmo O., Norsk Rødliste for Arter 2015, (2015)

[2]

Caizergues A., Bernard-Laurent A., Brenot J.-F., Ellison L., Rasplus J.Y., Population genetic structure of rock ptarmigan Lagopus mutus in Northern and Western Europe, Mol Ecol, 12, pp. 2267-2274, (2003)

[3]

Bech N., Boissier J., Drovetski S., Novoa C., Population genetic structure of rock ptarmigan in the 'sky islands' of French Pyrenees: Implications for conservation, Anim Conserv, 12, pp. 138-146, (2009)

[4]

Selkoe K.A., Toonen R.J., Microsatellites for ecologists: A practical guide to using and evaluating microsatellite markers, Ecol Lett, 9, pp. 615-629, (2006)

[5]

Guichoux E., Lagache L., Wagner S., Chaumeil P., Leger P., Lepais O., Et al., Current trends in microsatellite genotyping, Mol Ecol Resour, 11, pp. 591-611, (2011)

[6]

Fabbri E., Caniglia R., Mucci N., Thomsen H.P., Krag K., Pertoldi C., Et al., Comparison of single nucleotide polymorphisms and microsatellites in non-invasive genetic monitoring of a Wolf population, Arch of Biol Sci, 64, pp. 321-335, (2012)

[7]

Garke C., Ytournel F., Bed'Hom B., Gut I., Lathrop M., Weigend S., Et al., Comparison of SNPs and microsatellites for assessing the genetic structure of chicken populations, Anim Genet, 43, pp. 419-428, (2012)

[8]

DeFaveri J., Viitaniemi H., Leder E., Merila J., Characterizing genic and nongenic molecular markers: Comparison of microsatellites and SNPs, Mol Ecol Resour, 13, pp. 377-392, (2013)

[9]

Granevitze Z., David L., Twito T., Weigend S., Feldman M., Hillel J., Phylogenetic resolution power of microsatellites and various single-nucleotide polymorphism types assessed in 10 divergent chicken populations, Anim Genet, 45, pp. 87-95, (2014)

[10]

Flores-Renteria L., Whipple A.V., A new approach to improve the scoring of mononucleotide microsatellite loci, Am J Bot, 98, pp. e51-e53, (2011)

← 1 2 3 →