A comparative study of MEA and DEA for post-combustion CO2 capture with different process configurations

被引：37

作者：

Xue B. ^{[1
]}

Yu Y. ^{[1
]}

Chen J. ^{[1
]}

Luo X. ^{[2
]}

Wang M. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing

[2] Process and Energy Systems Engineering Group, School of Engineering, University of Hull, Hull

来源：

International Journal of Coal Science and Technology | 2017年 / 4卷 / 01期

关键词：

CO[!sub]2[!/sub] capture; DEA; Energy consumption; MEA; Process simulation;

D O I：

10.1007/s40789-016-0149-7

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

This paper presented a comparative study of monoethanolamine (MEA) and diethanolamine (DEA) for post-combustion CO2 capture (PCC) process with different process configurations to study the interaction effect between solvent and process. The steady state process model of the conventional MEA-based PCC process was developed in Pro/II® and was validated with the experimental data. Then ten different process configurations were simulated for both MEA and DEA. Their performances in energy consumption were compared in terms of reboiler duty and total equivalent work. The results show that DEA generally has better thermal performances than MEA for all these ten process configurations. Seven process configurations provide 0.38%–4.61% total energy saving compared with the conventional PCC process for MEA, and other two configurations are not favourable. For DEA, except one configuration, other process configurations have 0.27%–4.50% total energy saving. This work also analyzed the sensitivities of three key parameters (amine concentration, stripper pressure and lean solvent loading) in conventional process and five process modifications to show optimization strategy. © 2016, The Author(s).

引用

页码：15 / 24

页数：9

共 36 条

[1]

Aaron D., Tsouris C., Separation of CO2 from flue gas: a review, Sep Sci Technol, 40, 1-3, pp. 321-348, (2005)

[2]

Ahn H., Luberti M., Liu Z., Et al., Process configuration studies of the amine capture process for coal-fired power plants, Int J Greenhouse Gas Control, 16, pp. 29-40, (2013)

[3]

Aroonwilas A., Veawab A., Heat recovery gas absorption process, WO, (2007)

[4]

IEA report: carbon dioxide capture from power stations, (2001)

[5]

Batteux J., Godard A., Process and installation for regenerating an absorbent solution containing gaseous compounds, US, (1983)

[6]

Carson J.K., Marsh K.N., Mather A.E., Enthalpy of solution of carbon dioxide in (water + monoethanolamine, or diethanolamine, or N-methyldiethanolamine) and (water + monoethanolamine + N-methyldiethanolamine) at T = 298.15 K, J Chem Thermodyn, 32, 9, pp. 1285-1296, (2000)

[7]

Cousins A., Wardhaugh L.T., Feron P.H.M., Preliminary analysis of process flow sheet modifications for energy efficient CO2 capture from flue gases using chemical absorption, Chem Eng Res Des, 89, 8, pp. 1237-1251, (2011)

[8]

Cousins A., Cottrell A., Lawson A., Huang S., Feron P.H.M., Model verification and evaluation of the rich-split process modification at an australian-based post combustion CO2 capture pilot plant, Greenhouse Gas Sci Technol, 2, pp. 329-345, (2012)

[9]

Diab F., Provost E., Laloue N., Et al., Effect of the incorporation of speciation data in the modeling of CO2–DEA–H2O system, Fluid Phase Equilib, 353, pp. 22-30, (2013)

[10]

Dinca C., Comparative analyses of primary and secondary amines for CO2 chemical Process capture in a CFBC pilot installation, J Clean Energy Technol, 1, 3, (2013)

← 1 2 3 4 →