Estimation of design flood using EWT and ENE metrics and uncertainty analysis under non-stationary conditions

被引:0
作者
Yiming Hu
Zhongmin Liang
Xi Chen
Yongwei Liu
Huimin Wang
Jing Yang
Jun Wang
Binquan Li
机构
[1] Hohai University,State Key Laboratory of Hydrology
[2] Hohai University,Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering
[3] Hohai University,Research Institute of Management Science, Business School
[4] National Cooperative Innovation Center for Water Safety and Hydro-Science,College of Hydrology and Water Resources
来源
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment | 2017年 / 31卷
关键词
Non-stationarity; Design flood; Design reliability; Expected waiting time; Expected number of exceedances; Uncertainty;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Concepts of Expected Waiting Time (EWT) and Expected Number of Exceedances (ENE) have been presented in much literature for estimating the Design Flood (DF) under non-stationary conditions. The parameters of the EWT and ENE are generally no less than four, which inevitably leads to the uncertainty of the DF estimation. In this paper, the Bayesian method is proposed to analyze the impact of parameter estimation uncertainty on the EWT- and ENE-based estimation of the DF and Corresponding Design Reliability (CDR). In addition, a comparison analysis between the EWT and ENE is conducted in terms of the DF and CDR with or without a consideration being given to the impact of parameter uncertainty. In the case of giving no consideration to the impact of parameter uncertainty, the experiment results indicate that the EWT-based estimations are less than that of ENE in terms of DF and CDR in the case of a decreasing trend. While in the case of an increasing trend, the EWT-based estimations are bigger than that of ENE. In the case of considering the impact of parameter uncertainty, results in the case study show that the distribution of the EWT-based estimations of DF and CDR are left shifted compared to that of the ENE. Overall, the EWT-based estimations are significantly different from that of ENE in terms of DF and CDR. Therefore, it is necessary and open for further discussions about which metric will be optimal between the EWT and ENE for estimating the DF under non-stationarity.
引用
收藏
页码:2617 / 2626
页数:9
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Allamano P(2009)Global warming increases flood risk in mountainous areas Geophys Res Lett 36 1-5
[2]  
Claps P(2008)Climatic influences on streamflow timing in the headwaters of the Mackenzie River Basin J Hydrol 352 225-238
[3]  
Laio F(2015)Return period and risk analysis of nonstationary low-flow series under climate change J Hydrol 527 234-250
[4]  
Burn DH(2012)A nonstationary flood frequency analysis method to adjust for future climate change and urbanization J Hydrol 414–415 40-48
[5]  
Du T(2002)Statistics of extremes in hydrology Adv Water Resour 25 1287-1304
[6]  
Xiong LH(2012)Bayesian flood frequency analysis in the light of model and parameter uncertainties Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 26 721-730
[7]  
Xu CY(2014)A modified weighted function method for parameter estimation of Pearson type three distribution Water Resour Res 50 3216-3228
[8]  
Gippel CJ(2015)Climate-informed lowflow frequency analysis using nonstationary modelling Hydrol Process 29 2112-2124
[9]  
Guo SL(2013)Non-stationary flood frequency analysis in continental Spanish rivers using climate and reservoir indices as external covariates Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17 3189-3203
[10]  
Liu P(1951)The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for goodness of fit J Am Stat Assoc 46 68-78